◆ SpookStack

-lUr- \ no two of ms are. identical fro* a psychological point of In the present instanc*, howiTer, we are concerned not 30 auch with distinct Individuals AS with A whole cultural group* The members of thip group hArp been exposed to nodal influences,— f sjnily pattern a, methods of training and education, opportunities for development, etc-,—Hthlcb are fairly homogeneous withii a culture or ptrati of a Culture. The refllilt i s that the of a given culture t«od to act, thihk and feel more 03* elika, at least in contrast to the neubare of a different cultural group* This juetlflos, to aone extent, our speeJcicg af a ganaral cultural charactar. On thfl other hand, if a 1 • • • - larff« sattion of a giTan culture rebelle- against tha traditional patters thoa wv «uet a««une that now social influences hav* beeu Introduced which tand to produce ft type of character which cannot thrive in the old cultural environment. thlB happens it way to extranalj helpful to tha oatura of tie social forces which influenced tha development of lndlTidual membarfl of the group. Those Bfflj p«r™ aft cluae to an uod«rstandin£ of the: group as a whole inasauch • S.B we can then ibvnstigate the frequancy emd intensity of these some foroeH in the group as a whole and dr** ded.uction* con* • thflir effact upon ite iodivijual nenberp* If tha \ • ^ being studied happen* to be the leddar of the group, wa can expect to find the pertinent factors in an exaggerated form which would tend to'malcg them stand out in sharper relief • • - L * • than would be the case U wa studied an ATarage manber of ! • REPRODUCED AT THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES