Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
ADocumentaryHistoryOfTheCubanMissileCrisis1962
Page 288
288 / 354
89. (Continued)
NOTICE
This supplement updates and amplifies previous reports. Emphasis
” continues to be placed on the READINESS status, or changes therein, of the
offensive missiles in Cuba. This reportis based on photographic coverage
through Mission 5005 of Tuesday, 23 October 1962 (see Figure 1). The
quality of the recent, low-altitude photography permits positive identification
of many types of missile associated equipment.
SUMMARY
1. As yet there is no evidence of change in the pace of construction
activities.
2. There are no changes in the estimated dates of operational capability
for the MRBM and IRBM sites (see Figure 2).
3. No additional missiles, missile transporters, or erectors have been
identified (see Table 1).
. No new missile sites have been identified.
5. No IRBMs per se have yet been identified. ]
6, There is increasing evidence of the use of camouflage at several
sites,
7. Three of the Soviet ships suspected of being possible ballistic mis-
sile carriers enroute to Cuba are reportedly altering their course.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
pigs operation
soviet control induce
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic