Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 20
Page 7
7 / 23
Tatm
GIavin
Ir.
Ladd
Niebo
Ur.
Rosen
Traey
Supreme Court
Mr.
Acers
Mr. Carton
Controversy
Mr. Harbo
Mr. Hendon
lares Again
Mr. Mumlord
Mr. Starke
Eo ge Asrociate Press
Justice Felix Franfurter added
Mr. Quinn Tamm
Jaa JueI ye terd y to the, coniro-
Mr. Neas.
Hry gmong Supreme Court Jur.
Won over. ho' Int rpret tlon. o!
Miss Gaady
t hccoljearues.wre resorting
Spotrine of con titutional lax?
Takes Szoeytiom
The. wern yirtually tho sam.
I Whare tha reorganization sujer-
Forda Justtces Black and Murphy
se
... prlor ptoceeding in eitper
th Fedarel or Btats court, the
Hanknurtar's ylews on ytllty rato
baruptcy court li the one wlich
makdins.
is sthorlzd to allow the reason.
latast tff developed over
abl posts and expeates' incurred
th E court's dacislon that Fedtral
intheprior
proceeding,"
the
bapkruptcy.
Iatherthan
op ten satd.
St3te courts. has, exclusive power
Lut Franxfurter asserted that
tx foes.for.attorneyn.who_rep
frr.
'the beginning Congress had
J05 nnos og oqt af pa
aHowed Federally created rights to
ptation undergoing reorganization
bo onforced in State courts "not
only by the general implicatlons.
ranturter agreed with ti the
Of our legal system but also by ex-.
Ofar justlees that in this paftleu-
pllcit authorization."
oass ine bankruptcy pourt
Ho deciared that the Constitu-
Shzuld detarmine the fees bet ve:
ton does not give the Bankruptcy
hg nently expressed oppositlon, In
Act supremacy.over the right of
concurring
opinion. to the
States to determine wh:t shall be
Bhunds which tho Supreme Oourt
litigated in
theircourts,
and
Chad ier its dnding.
under what conditions.
TThe case Invoived the reorgani-
"And certainly." be added, "such
zstJon the Reynolds Investing
a wholly novel doctrine of constitu-
Inc, in the Yederal Dlstrict
tional Iaw should not be resorted
JIt of New Jergey. Thre. attor.
togratultously when.the case le-
S acting tor the debtor,-and later
foje us can be dispcsed of on the
foy.trustees for the company. nled
cdhclusive ground that the litita-
st in ths New York courts to col-
tjn conducted in the New Ydrk
le
certaln elaims. Before judg-
courts was conducted under an ar-
hts wers'returned, the attorneys'
rangement
consonant with
New
Zices were discontinued. There.
York law..
Un, upder New York State judi-
Ty law and In conformity with
ar arrangemeut in the reorganiea-
proqeodlng, the thres sued in
State courts to obtaln fees for
thi
I inrvices, and were swarded
.000:
/2-2J5A
astise Dougdas' opinion decli red
S undar thapter io of the Bynk.
ITCOrDED
W Aot, Con re had oonfetted
Famount and pxciudre" juhis.
GT FEB 12 1944
on.oa the bankruptcy court.
FE38
WASHINGTON POST
Page.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic