◆ SpookStack

UNCLASSIFIED To: San Diego From: San Diego Re: SD 205-0, 02/10/2011 Based upon the presentation provided by was asked to make available for an interview. was interviewed on 02703/2011, as documented in the enclosed FD-302. Eollowing. the interview, was asked to provide documentation from the Ensenada AG's office that the 100,000 peso bond is still pending. On 02/05/2011, Writer received two e-mails from forwarded two emails from One email related to the construction of a fire station in Tijuana paid for by Sempra and donated to Tijuana. 'The payment of these expenses circumvented the traditional. approval process. The second email Qayments the niec affairs cabinet minister. also circumvented the traditional approval process. also stated in his email that he had. given an interview Channel 10 news regarding our meeting with. emails and attachments are maintained in the. A section of the zero file. b6 Media articles published on 02/06/2011 regarding. b7C meeting with government investigators are maintained in the 1A section of the zero file. Writer located a web link in the comments. Navajo Nation to the Speaker of the Navajo Nation Councll. The 1etter 1s dated 11/08/2010 and its purpose is to veto Resolution No. cO-42-10, which granted Sempra and a piping company (non-Navajo entities) exclusive rights to a wind project on the reseryation. Certain Navajo laws were. disregarded in approving the resolution; furthermore, the letter states that reports. were received that Sempra and the. piping company representatives offered certain elected officials cash for their vote in favor of the resolution. In addition, Council Delegate stated on the floor of the Navajo Nation Council that on 09/23/2010 he was offered "campaign funds" in the 1A section of the zero file. Based upon the foregoing information and that documented in the. enclosed FD-302s, AusA and DOJ Deputy Chief concluded that insufficient evidence existed fo criminal prosecution in this matter as it relates. to the FCPA allegation against Sempra. However, given this and other. similar allegations of misconduct concerning Sempra's business operations, Sempra was 'requested to undertake the following actions during a telephone call with. on 02/10/2011: UNCLASSIFIED 5