◆ SpookStack

and William Harper.. Harper had alleged that there had been two different firing positions on the evening in question. The L.A.P.D. report stated that the slug that penetrated the ceiling where Sirhan was observed firing. It was argued that the steep upward trajectory of the shot that penetrated the ceiling tile was the result of the struggle during Sirhan's apprehension. However, in testimony before the Los Angeles City Council in August 1975, Assistant Chief of Police Daryl Gates, stated that these ceiling panels had been destroyed in i969 immediately fol- lowing the trial. The destruction of the ceiling panels and other non-introduced court evidence was unexplained but an important dis- crepancy arose. The 197i inter-departmental correspondence to Chief Davis apparently made reference to ceiling tiles. Whether were used to verify the 1971 departmental correspondence is not certain at this time.. One other area concerning bullets that became an issue, par- ticularly to william Harper, was the photograph of People's 48, the Kennedy death bullet. The photograph itself, People's 49, was an enlarged magnification of People's 48. The purpose of the enlarged photograph was to show the small gold areas on the fragmented death bullet so the potential witness, particularly, Dewayne Wolfer at trial, could testify as to the mini mag ammunition content. It was expected that .these indications of mini mag fragments would show that the fragments themselves had been fired from a weapon bearing the same rifling specification as the Sirhan weapon. Additionally. this Sirhan weapon was also shown to have already fired the other bullets in question and the more identifiable bullets, People's 47, 52, and 54. Therefore, the photograph, People's 49, was to be illustrative of Wolfer's testimony. Interestingly though, Defense Counsel Grant Cooper objected to the presentation of People's 49 on the ground that an illustration of the nature of the Kennedy death bullet would prejudice the jury. Prosecutor Dave Fitts argued that feg eo deed deeeeaeae deeg heeeead oe peeeeeee deee aedene aae prosecution's case. It was Cooper who stipulated at trial that the to testify it was held." Cooper's intent upon stipulation of muzzle distance was to keep any inflamatory testimony concerning the actual firing of the weapon by Sirhan away from the jury. Additionally, Defense Counsel Grant Cooper stipulated that People's 55 (mismarked envelope) could be received into evidence after prosecutor Fitts had asked Wolfer that the envelope had. Before Wolfer could answer, the stipulation was made, and the mismarked envelope was received into evidence.