◆ SpookStack

J 7,! bullets and the test fired bullets fired by Wolfer! conceivably might have been sufficient to match up the bullets with the Sirhan weapon, or at least one weapon alone, the several twogun advocates always demanded that the gun itself be test fired. It must be remembered that criminalists Harper and Macbonell never actually analyzed the victim or test fired bullets with a comparison "microscope. Their. process of investigation was primarily by using a Balliscan camera and photographs, the photos of which were then subsequently given to MacDonell in 1973. Even during Supervisor Ward's hearings in 197, no testimony was given regarding a classical microscopic test the traditional ballistics examination!. In other words, the orchestration of doubt con- cerning the Sirhan case, and the demand that the gun itself be test fired, increased in intensity despite the fact that no comparison microscopic test of the victim and evidence bullets had ever been conducted by anyone other than criminalist Dewayne Wolfer. More- over, despite the fact that petitioners Paul Schrade and CBS requested such microscopic examination in their August 1975 petition, public opinion and public demand was such that the test firing of the weapon became the prime concern and prime objective of the petition filed before the Court, and in the public state- ments concerning the reopening of the Sirhan case. It should also be emphasized that the five ballistics experts, who were able to link bullets H7, 52, and 59 to having been fired from one gun and one gun alone, and the seven ballistics experts who identified the gross and individual characteristics present on all bullets the evidence bullets, the 1968 and 1975 test fired bullets!, were able to base their conclusions that there was no evidence of a second gun almost entirely on evidence that existed in 1968. Due to the severe leaded condition of the barrel, the test firing of the weapon in 1975, and the eight test fired bullets recovered in 1975, actually added very little to the actual identi- fication of the three victim bullets as having been shot by one weapon. Five of the seven making this conclusion!. The 1975 test firing did establish similarities in gross and individual charac- teristics, although not of a sufficient number to positively link all the bullets with the Sirhan weapon itself. Although Special Counsel Kranz has no evidence of any tampering by any individual, it is entirely possible, and is the opinion of Special Counsel Kranz, that the severe leaded barrel was a condition that distorted the possibility of identification of the testfired bullets as testified by the seven experts!. There is the possibility that over the past several years, people with either authorized or unauthorized access to the exhibits and the weapon itself, may have attempted to create doubt about the Sirhan case by attempts to lead the barrel in various ways. When the original theory of two guns are analyzed for what they were I _ §B _