Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
john-lilly — Part 01
Page 7
7 / 23
Jones to DeLoach memo 6-28-60 re: Dr. John C. Lilly
ACTION TAKEN ON DR. LILLY'S COMPLAINT
An immediate check was made of the records of the Identification Division.
There are some 37 criminal prints under the name John Lilly. The complainant in this.
matter, John Cunningham Lilly, has in our files two civil prints, one feflecting his.
employment by the Dspartment of Health, Education and Welfare in 1955. The other is
an elimination print taken in 1934 when Dr. Lilly's mother was the victim of an extortion
case. Dr. Lilly and all members of his family were fingerprinted at that time. There is.
no indication in our files that the information from our Identification Division was every
furnished to a official of the Department of Defense. Bufiles reflect no derogatory
information of a criminal nature concerning Dr. Lilly. Bufile 100-344452-7-39, page 78,
reflects J. C. Lilly as a member of the Federation of American Scientists. This organi-
zation was opposed to military control of atomic energy and was in favor of secrecy in
scientific work. A Bureau investigation, closed in 1950, did not reflect communist
domination of this group. Dr. Lilly's address indicated as Johnson Foundation, Philadelphia,.
Pennsylvania. Bufiles contain no references pertaining to Communications Research
Institute.
b6
b7C
In view of Dr. Lilly's allegations, a check of the Defense Department was
made by the Name Check Section.SA
contacted George J. Gould, Chief,
Security Services, Office of the Secretary of Defense, on 6-22-60. Mr. Gould advised
that the records of his office reveal that a request had been received by them on 6-26-59
from the Office of Science for a "Secret" clearance for Lilly. Mr. Gould continued that
his office made the necessary checks, including a check of the FBI, and as the checks
made revealed no derogatory information, a "Secret' clearance was authorized by his
office on August 27, 1959.
He stated that the check of FBI records for information of a subversive
derogatory nature was returned stamped "No investigation conducted pertinent to your
inquiry." Mr. Gould stated further that according to his records no check of the criminal
records of the Bureau had been made. All name checks from defense are cidinarily made
through Mr. Gould's office, and would not be made by an individual assigned to another
office. It is noted that in May, 1959, Dr. Lilly apparently had not received a 'Secret"
clearance and possihlity exists he may have been excluded from a portion of a conference
at that time if it involyed "Secret" material..
OBSERVATIDNS:
It.is apparent that the information received by Dr. Lilly is incorrect. It
could well be at the time of the meeting mentioned above an error was made by someone
in the Defense Department in excluding Dr. Lilly. It may be that now in an attempt to
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic