Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
gary-webb — Part 01
Page 2
2 / 2
FD-350 (Rev. 5-8-81)
(Indicate page, name ot
newspaper, city and state.}
(Mount Clipping in Space Below)
Date:
Edition:
pten-ber 15 l9q s
Jury rules against PD
Tite: The Plain
Wealer
in race promoters' suit
Front Page
By JOHN F. HAGAN
Character:
STAFF WRITER
terview that the facts in the articles
Or
A Cuyahoga County Common
did not support the allegations.
Sub C
Pleas jury yesterday awarded $13.5
"As a result of these articles, two
Submitting Office:
million in a libel case against The
men's reputations were harmed,"
Plain Dealer filed by two former.
said the juror, who asked that his
Indexing:
promoters of the Budweiser Cleve-
name not be used. "As a result, it is
iand Grand Prix, who claimed they
the justice system's duty to see that
were defamed in stories about their
financial dealings that appeared
these men were compensated for
the injustice done to them. It was
beginning July 1.1984.
obvious and apparent to the whole
An eight-person jury decided in a
jury that these articles did defame
unanimous verdict
in favor
OF
Charles K Newcomb and James A
the reputations of these men."
Foster, who promoted the yace
The PD argued that the stories
when it was called the Budweiser
were accurate.
Cleveland 500
Alex Machaskee,PD publisher,
Webb's stories said Newcomb?
pursue appropriate legal proe
and Foster had been the main ben
eficiaries of the auto race. The?
stories also detailed other financial
ings to overturn the verdict."
dealings the partners had with they
Newcomb and Foster sat nearly
city.
still as the jury's yerdict was read
by Judge Joseph/F. McManamon,
The articles said the promoters
who presided oyer the eight-week
"paid themselves' nearly$1 million
trial.Later, thgy exchanged hugs
from race proceeds for manage-
with theirwives and lawyers.
ment fees, salaries, commissions,
Newcomb and Foster declined
legal and accounting fees and
comment.
equipment rental fees in violation
The jury,Avhich deliberated for a
of'the lease they had with the city.
day and a/half, found against The
PD and Gary Webb.yho wrote the
articles. Webb now works for a San
Jose, Cahif., newspaper.
The jury awarded Newcomb and
Foster's company, C.K. Newcomb
and Associates,$2.2 million in com-
1 pensatory damages and $2 million
in punitive damages. It awarded
Neweomb $1.9 million in compen-
satory damages and $3.5 million in
punitive. damages ' and
Foster
$400.000 in compensatory damages
and s3.5 million in punitive dam-
ages. Newcomb and Foster had
asked the jury for S16 million.
183B-cv~yz510 Sa1G
The jury foreman said in an in-
S100
TED
INDEXED
.59
JAN 15 i.J1
b6
b7C
FBI/DOJ
›
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic