◆ SpookStack

- | know what any specific decision would be, but x seriously doubt . that an attorney for either. side could raise a question about the recordings. . ae ; Mr. Sourwine, Do you think that the consent of an at~ comney in a case like that would bind his client if he subse~_ quently discovered that the attorney had consented without his knowledge to having the jury delibevations wecorded? Mr. Makva. Weil, 1% is my understanding that an most in- stances -- and I do not know whether it covers this one or not «~ an attorney does speak for his. client. Mr, Sourwine. That does. not answer my question. | Now, - ‘you are a lawyer. Mo. Mikva. Yes; sir. . Mr. Sourwine. Is the client bound in an instance 1ike that by the consent that the attorney had given?. ‘Mv, Mikva. I would think he would. be: yes, sir. Mz, Sourwine. Don't you know that the client could have fined that attorney out on his car and gotten another one promptiy and put in any appropriate motions ox exceptions ? Mr, Mikva. I do not know that, sir. | Mr, Sourwine. You do not know? Mr. Mikva. No, sir. | “Mc, Souxwine. You do not think he could? Me. Mikva. i you are asking me my opinion now, the answer is no, UY do not. think he could.