Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Thurgood Marshall — Part 1
Page 149
149 / 156
.....
}
M 1
-
DL
N3-T39
on
September
27,
1957,
defendants
filed
an
appeal
to
the
U.
S.
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
Fifth
Circuit,
rrom
the
final
Judgment
herein;
entered
on
September
9,
l957,
on
October
3,
1957.
the
U.
S.
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
Fifth
Circuit
ordered
that
the
application
for
leave
to
file
petition
for
srit
of
mandamus
be
set
for
hearing
and
oral
argument,
along
with
and
at
the
same
time
as
the
appeal,
at
the
forth-
coming
session
of
the
Court
at
Fort
North,
Texas,
at
10:00
AM,
Friday,
November
22,
1957.
with
reference
to
the
petition
on
which
ruling
was
entered
by
the
Appeals
Court
on
August
27,
1957,
the
denial
reads
as
follows:
Per
curism:
by
petition
for
rehearing
the
appellees
express
their
apprehension
that,
under
the
terms
of
an
Act
of
the
1957
Texas
Legislature
approved
by
the
Governor
on
the
23rd
day
of
lay,
1957,
and
to
become
effective
on
to
wit
August
23,
1957,
their
obedience
to
the
order
of
the
district
court
to
be
issued
upon
remand,
pursuant
to
the
directions
of
this
court,
lay
result
in
the
loss
to
the
School
District
of
some
six
million
dollars
$6,000,000.00!
a
year
or
aid
from
the
State
of
Texas
and
in
the
imposition
by
the
State
of
penalties
upon
the
persons
carrying
out
such
order.
That
set,
of
course,
cannot
operate
to
relieve
the
members
of
this
Court
of
their
sworn
duty
to
support
the
Constitution
of
the
United
States,
the
same
duty
which
rests
upon
the
members
of
the
several
State
Legislatures
and
all
executive
and
Judicial
officers
of
the
several
states.
we
cannot
assume
that
that
solem
sworn
duty
sill
be
breached
by
any
officer,
State
or
Federal.
If,
however,
it
should
be,
then
the
Board
of
Trustees
of
the
School
District
and
the
persons
carrying
out
the
order
to
be
issued
by
the
district
court,
are
not
without
their
legal
remedies.
The
petition
for
rehearing
is
denied.
This
order
filed
at
Dallas,
Texas,
by
Clerk,
U.
S.
gégtrict
Court
for
the
Northern
District
of
Texas,
September
9,
- pa
-
"J
_
3 -
-
92Lf
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic