◆ SpookStack

C We eee AS _—— o£ the election procedure when Sera, in terms of a meaningful Kegro citizens’ registering is choice is of significance". Ns « right to vote, int ference with irkeacference at the most critical Iz i: srve of course that stege of the election proceduze./ tae framers of the Constitution éid not know about the rege seen cies 3ESCess; Neither they but/they did Met have in mind the selection of sansters i2..2 representatives by the Girect primary. In United Statss v. Louisiana, EVD.La. 1963, on other grounds, AE OR an ae aen mF) fos 24, wo. Ae 25. mee “£602 €. OO 399, JS%, ALL af +70 vue 2 oe iid hits VOU said: ‘Congressional aytnority tends to registration, a process unknown to the a critical, inseparable process which must nsacer oncern the United States, since registration ta vote covers voting in federal as well as in In United States v, Manning, WU. stéce elections. D.22. 1963, 215 F. Supp. 272, one of the constitutional atcack: o21 t1s Civil Rights Act of 1960 was directed at the provision fcr _ fifo. upholding the act, the Cours “For purposes of ec abissti¢ga fhe ale Ve joe ve eis Sat the act of casting cannot be cut away vegistration. divisible part of “eleces separate registration interference with the registrars. In the opinion important that-~ tne constitutional "Givisible Va olowS. & voting booth 2 tne process. cnact starts with tration is an in- . . Trere is no . aecal~atéctions. Any cé voter's right to register is therefore sntexterence with a federal 215 Pe election." Supp. 2% (c) Classic relied on three impcccaat cases that constiue the nature and extent of the power giections: Ex parte Sieboid, “x parte Yarbrough, The Au Xlux 4 S.Ct. OAM Tr oe iad ae 3a7 eet We we ped her aie ‘ -3Sc, 152, 28 L.Ed. 274; ang Sur: of Congress to regulate federal 100 U.S. 371, 25 L.Ed. 7i7; Klan cases, 3884, 110 U.S. 651, United States, 1934, . AQE Tow eee Thess sAazsse acs rs, Hess oases cs