◆ SpookStack

«"Bundy'gpicturg, _ The detective said he was the one e who showed .Miss DaRonch pictures of * Bundy’s car and she said it resembled _ the car her abductor drove. “Don’t you think it was unbelievable “she could identify the car 10 months . > later?™ Mr. O’Connell asked the detec- ive “No,” he. replied. * _ The defense attorney also questioned ‘ Det. Thompson’s seeking a search warrant for Bundy’s car after it had _ already been searched. .That search warrant alleged the " detective was looking for a gun and Miss DaRonch’s purse and wallet. » The detective said Bundy was a « “good” suspect in the kidnaping inci- dent, so he thought the search warrant “was a valid avenue of recourse. Under further questioning, Det. Thompson said the ‘‘shiny shoes” examination was actually connected to a Bountiful case, but he did not elab- orate. . During the morning, Mr: and Mrs. Wilbur F’. Walsh, Murray, testified that _ they first met Miss DaRonch when.she ~ he eid ? st sot ee : we t ran ‘in front of their car after escaping from her alleged abductor. The couple said they were fearful at. first the girl might be dangerous or an escapee since she had a handcuff on one arm. They took the hysterical girl to the Murray City Police Department where jawmen heard her story. The final witness Tuesday was Mar- garet Maughn, who was Bundy’s neigh- bor at 565-ist Ave. She told the court she remembered a tear in the backseat of Bundy’s car. , Miss DaRonch said the backseat of her assailant’s car s was torn. Query on Shoes Mr. O’Connéll asked her if Bundy ever wore shiny, patent leather shoes. “No,” she said. Mr. Yocom indicated he would finish his list of prosecution witnesses Wed- nesday when the case continues in Room 310 of the Salt Lake City-County Pullding. Bundy is expected to take the stand in this own defense as part of Mr. 4O’Connell’s presentation. ‘ . “