◆ SpookStack

* Airtel to SAC, Detreit _ ‘ae iem Entries — Detroit Office regarding this matter, | hen may or x Fa eazy UV AVS AMVRHGCU 2U LULA CSE ZTERLULEE £EF GURL. © of the Detroit Office regarding this matter. int 95 Aaa aes Detroit should be prepared to cooperate in the event ef ee wuch contact. An accumulation of files in anticipation of such a contact is unnecessary.- However, a list ef files in response to this request should be prepared in order that necessary Tiles « can be readily obtained it such contact “aya ilable for review" ur. Gardner has indicate tad he would like to have eufficient number of files on hand to insure a continuous review, As he reviews the SVP files, he expects to be able to have within a reasonable amount of time additional files (June, informant, subs, enclosures, etc.) which he identifies frou the main case file as being | pertinent to the inquiry, tate a ‘The voluminous amount of mn terial being sought for review will result in some limitation on the time available to conduct an adequate review of substantive files te insure concealment ofinformants, If informant files are ealled for review by the Departmental Attorney, such files are not to be made available. Tamediate ly refer the matter to FBIRG for consideration, J. . The me thod by which ‘the files are , supplied is left to your discretion, However, it is expected that every effort be made to avoid _Unnecesaary delay in furnishing tifes to hin. ay You ghould resolve any question as to whether or not a particular file should be provided by contacting | appropriate substantive deak at FBIHQ. You should also insure that personnel ‘susigned to assist in obtaining material for review are not connected. — - with thoge entry matters _which are to be reviewed, You should also be aware that Departmental Attorneys do not desire to speak with pergonnel invyoly ed in any sapest of _ the matters \ which they are to Oo reviews », it ae 7 Be _ cop we . - = . a nd * ope Ry a <7 “oo som Te eee