Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 6
Page 10
10 / 16
*) watt i
ey.
™, see df
vie Se
PE EL dl
af ok
“Tye
tage rate
e
he)
A
Me
‘
ae
eg det
vir
ies SRE:
'
7
By
ul
Ete Bat tot
i
IL
|
|
|
|
. aS: -
: rr oe
Memorandum C, D, Brennan to Mr. ¥. Cc. Sullivan CaF
RE: ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCES oo. ; at
66-8160 oe .
£2 ma —-.. naan a@® he WPT we An”
845 yvu are aWATG, ian thse Lan Ol Cas co. We BO .
not request phone taps except in cases involving -.. .
kidnaping and espionage. This has been predicated .-
upon my theory that when the life of an individual
or the life of the Nation is in peril a phone tap
is justified for intelligence purposes asany infor-
mation obtained over a phone tap cannot be used
in the trial of a criminal case. ”
€
On July 30, 1965, FBI representatives and Departmental .
attorneys conferred regarding a Presidential memorandun, dated
June 30, 1965, which dealt with technical and microphone sur-
veillances, This_memorandug, addressed to all heads of
executive departments and agencies, ¢ 3, established st ‘Strict jeuteee
obtaining “of approval 3 from “the s Attorney ¢ General. It also ,
required the submission ‘of a complete inventory of all mechanical
and electronic equipment capable of intercepting telephone :
conversations.
my Because the Bureau obtained authority from the
Attorney General and consulted with the Department regarding
the use of these surveillance techniques, the Departmental
representatives stated that the Bureau was already complying
with the Presidential memorandum and that it would not be .
necessary to submit an inventory of equipment.
In early 1965, the Senate Subcommittee on Administra-
tive Practice and Procedure, headed by Senator Edward V. Long ©
of Missouri and popularly known as the Long Committee, began
inguirier into Federal encroachments on citizens' privacy. .
' In view of these inquiries, it was necessary to severely
restrict and, in many instances, eliminate the Bureau's: use =
of these techniques.
Since the Bureau's heavy responsibilities for
investigative results continued, the Director, in a memo-_
Yandum dated September i4, iScés5, expressed to the Attorney a
General concern tht undue limitations on special investigative _..
techniques would make it far more difficult to combat sub- *.
version and organized crime. The Attorney General, in a _
memorandum dated September 27, 1965, agreed with the Director
and authorized the resumption of several special investigative
techniques, In this memorandum the Attorney | ao
I
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic