Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 3
Page 97
97 / 101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you and each of you solemnly swear that all of the testimony
that you will give in these proceedings will be the truth, the whole
truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God i
Mr. Apaus. I do.
Mr. Wanwnauz. I do.
_The Cuamman. After yesterday's hearing I asked the staff to fur-
nish me with the statutory authority that presently exists that could
be said to relate to the FBYs intelligence activities, which was of
course the subject of yesterday’s hearings. And I am furnished in
Tesponse to that request title X VIII, section 533, of the United States
, which reads as follows:
- The Attorney General may appoint officials: 1. to detect and prosecute crimes
aganist the United States; 2, to assist in the protection of the person of the
President; and 3. to conduct such other investigations rexarding official mat-
ters under the contro] of the Department of Justice and the Department of State
as may be directed by the Attorney General. .
Now yesterday, Mr. Wannall, we were told about.a series of activi-
ties that were undertaken by the FBI, and indeed. initiated within the
FBI, the purpose of which was to harass and discredit Dr. Martin
Luther King. I am not referring to the results of any FBI investiga-
tive activity, but rather, I am referring to these kinds of initiatives
that were undertaken for the purpose of either harassing or em-
barrassing or otherwise discrediting Dr. King himself. My first ques-
tion is: was Dr. King, in his advocacy of equal rights for black
citizens, advocating a course of action that in the opinion of the FBI
constituted a crime?
TESTIMONY OF JAMES B. ADAMS, DEPUTY ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR
OF THE FBI, AND RAYMOND WANNALL, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,
FRI INTELLIGENCE DIVISION
Mr. Apaus. No, sir. -
The Caamxan. So he was not then thought to be engaged in any
criminal activity. In fact, he was preaching, as I remember those
days, nonviolence, was he not, es a method of achieving equal rights
710
for black citizens?
Mr. Apama. That’s right, his advocacy for civil rights.
The Cuatruwan. His advocacy of civil rights was nonviolent and
therefore legal in character.
Mr. Apaus. That was not the basis of our investigation of him.
The Cuairman. But as you have said, he was not engaging in any
unlawful activity in connection with his advocacy of equal rights for
black citizens. Is that correct ? i”
Mr. Apams. Yes, sir. ;
The Caarmsan. Well, is it true that at one time the FBI undertook
to discourage an American college from conferring an honorary degree
~~
on Dr. King?
Mr. Apaxs. Yes, sir. 7 ae
The Cramman, On what legal basis does the FBI have a right to
interfere, in an effort to discourage a college from conferring an
honorary degree upon a man like Dr. Martin Luther King, who was
not engaging in or suspected of engaging in criminal activity ?
Mr. Apa. I know of no basis.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic