Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 3
Page 80
80 / 101
an ce
I. B. Ada
e — + Ac0ams
Y
tious Entries
a
; 1975, we advised the Civil Ri
Division of an Oc , 1963, entry against a domestic group
in New York City. The entry, against the Fair Play for
Cuba Committee, was outside the scope of the Department's
inquiry (i. e., entries subsequent to January 1, 1966) ; how-
ever, on instruction of Deputy Associate Director Adams,
who discovered the entry information during a review of
material dealing with the Oswald investigation, we furnished
information to the Civil Rights Division. (Memorandum attached)
ights
vate ee ee Reem ee ek ee Ee Cam kbamkae 893
Subsequent to prepararvion or WEL September aig
1975, memorandum dealing with domestic targets, we learned
of an October, 1963, entry against a domestic target in
New York City. Although this target did not fall within
the scope of the Department's inquiry, we, nevertheless,
furnished details to the Department, and amended our memoranda
to the SSC. In addition, we amended a memorandum forwarded
to the HSC on November 5, 1975, to include this newly discovered
entry.
On January 8, 1976, in connection with the Socialist
Workers Party (SWP) suit against the Bureau, a communication
was directed to our New York Office (as well as all other
offices) to determine if any documents existed pertaining
to entries against the SWP. (Communication attached)
On January 22, 1976, the New York Office advised
of a number of entries against the SWP (93) which had not
previously been brought to the attention of either the SWP
plaintiffs, or the Department. These entries occurred during
| the time frame 1960-1966. (Communication attached)
There was no indication in the January 22 communication
from New York that documents or information about entries,
other than the SWP entries, existed at New York. More particu-
{| tariy. no indication was given that entry information existed
after Mr. Hoover's July, 1966, instruction.
The discovery of entries against the SWP during
ythe period 1960 - 1966 was brought to the attention of the
SWP plaintiffs; however, as those entries occurred prior
to Mr. Hoover's termination of such activity and outside
the Statute of Limitations, there was at that time no concern
over amending our previously furnished statistics to the
oe SSC and the HSC. The Department, in connection with its
z handling of the SWP suit, was advised.
-5-
CONTINUED - OVER
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic