Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Surreptitious Entries Black Bag Jobs — Part 2
Page 76
76 / 101
Aw
}
QUESTION: Sir, would you say that the Cubans who burglarized
Nanial Plehercacte nevahiateriaetta vafFfian cehanta ane
OLE et ole Bid hel Nee te - Mey wits evs ee GB Whew SAL AL
‘have been convicted then since they thought that
they were on a national security mission? They
didn't intend to violate any laws. That was their
testimony. =
ANSWER: I have no judgment insofar as that because my
province is in presenting the facts and for the
review and determination by the courts and if such
a a ee ee 2 ee ca a Poe. | fees on
to give. them any sanctuary. I'm trying to keep in
f . 4H 4NLGLenee was made it was not AHL Wy WE
7 the area of our facts and that particular thing as
a
me ee i,
ogg Bre Pr
to whether or not they had any intent or whether or
not it is a viable defense is up to the courts.
QUESTION: | Mr. Kelley, did you twice mention that you expect
some resolution to this question in the courts?
How is it going to get into the courts?
ANSWER: I don't know. It possibly will be some sort of a
@efense, rather some sort of a presentation to the
courts by the Attorney General. He has indicated
that perhaps this being a Constitutional question--
it being a matter of the executive privilege of the
presidential power--that it might well be necessary
to have such a review to determine.
VESTION: k Were all of these break-ins conducted with the
permission of either the Attorney General or the
. President at the time? Or were there any that were
, ° conducted without such approval?
ANSWER: I cannot, at this point, give you any particulars
- about the program. I just say, as I did before,
a and this....
. QUESTION: . Because you don't know or because you're withholding
comment?
* ANSWER: - I'm withholding comment.
QUESTION: , Mr. Kelley, I'm still unclear about distinction
between break-ins before 1966 and afterward. Is the
reduction in number the only change that was made or
was there change in the limitations on the targets ,
that were used? .
ee
-
e
5
ed
There was a change insofar as the targets just being -
in the subsequent area confined to those matters which
’ Were concerned in foreign counterintelligence.
a eee owe a
t
“2. ag e7
OTD eee ete ee, oo
ea rie fie iid Ta ;
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic