Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 28
Page 13
13 / 83
SEL?
; THE GOVERNING BOARD of the au-
gust American Bar Association has ap-
proved a recommendation that Congress,
by use of the Jegislative process, reverse
me recent decisions of the United States
apreme Court. The rulings in question
“have upneta individual rights against in-
fringement by state or’ federal laws de-
_ nism. - ai
‘The. ABA {s on controversial ground
and gives evidence that It recognizes this
by its cautious approach. The committee
report which the ABA governors endorsed
is eareful to point out that the Supreme
Court is “the ultimate guardian of the
freedom.”
Nevertheless, says the ABA report new
approved for submission to the entire
igmembership: ,
“Many cases have been decided in such
@ manner as to encourage an increase in
Communist activities in the United States.
Our internal security has been weakened
by technicalities raised in judicial dect-
sions which too frequently in the public
mind have had the effect of putting on
trial the machinery of the tudicial ororese
we OE MACUNnery OL TNE JUudicia: Process
and freeing the subversive to go forth and
further undermine the nation.”
t 3 .
THE SUPREME COURT is under in-
creasing fire these days. Much of the at-
| tack stems from its libertarian trend.
i Some Southerners would undo its man-
i date against segregated arhoois, by limit-
ing the court's powers or by constitutional
change giving states exclusive authority in
* the fieid of education. But segregationist
are not the only critics. J. Edgar Hoove
|i FBI chieftain, lashed out at ruling
which “defeat the interests of justice." An
.
TOP CLIPPING es
caren a! 7 =! (
Vaan hina BN
mo ef OTIALED
Li 9)
ole be RGN Mm fypa
fv Le 59
re. we “rar “aa
The Court : Before The ‘Bar’
signed to combat subversion and commu- |
Bill of Rights and the protector of our.
. miter plified on
preme, is still the best way’.
. paaiid em
a ‘o
Rep. Kenneth R: Keathig. New York Re- .
publican, said the Court had “gone alto-
gether too far-in its zeal to prot@t the
rights of the individual.” .
The ABA leadership has joined the
swelling chorus ony philosophical rath-
er than emotional grounds. Its influence
will be great because this is a field in
which it is qualified tospeak. - - i
e
ine THE GENTLEMEN of the bar fre not
asking for the creation of precedent. There
is ample -precedent for Congress (and the
people) to say a final word after the Su-
preme Court has spoken. A most notable
' case in paint is the 16th Amendrient au -
thorizing 4 federal income tax, It specific
Cesena Lactate Pe -
any Nned af 1895 SUpreie Tour ac -
cision holding that such a tax was un-
constitutional,
_ Precedent, however, is not involved
here. A principle is at stake.
The Supreme Court was devised to pro-
tect the rights of the individual, regard-
less of the charges or the temper of the
times. An irfdependent judicial authorfty
above thé political turmoil has served us
well. Though sometimes it has lagged be-
hind public opinion, ft has as often been
ahead of it. Our system of legislative, ju-
dicial and executive authority, no one Ea
ra
ee
"YHE MIAMI HERALD
February 25, 1959
George Beebe,
Managing Editor
+ "NOT SOT REGOPRED
WT MA2 1'7 1959
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic