Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 26
Page 79
79 / 116
oer
-) (Rey, 10-20-57)
. Killing the Umpire 3
- t .‘s One approach to the Jenner-Butler
fa which would modify some recent Belen
upreme Court decisions, is to denounce we J
; it’as'a measure designed to “kill the um- Pare
Rose
pire.” This is not an approach which
reflects much credit on the maturity of
preme Court of jurisdiction to overrule
a refusal by a State to permit an indi-
. vidual to practice law in the State, This
ig. a reaction to two questionable de-
cisions last year, and in some small de-
gree. it would curb the power jot the:
court, It ts not an earth-shaking issue,
Y Gandy
iis
Tamm
; those who adopt it. wok ot Trotter _
* i}. ., The bill would do four things. The Clayton
first provision’ would deprive the Su- Tele. Room —_—
Holloman
for- ‘ahy person denied permission to
‘practice law would have an appeal to.
thé courts of the State. The question is
portance to justify Congress in exercis-
ing its constitutional power to limit the —
\court’s jupisdiction. We doubt that it is.
<The second provision would modify
the court’s controversial ruling in the
Watkins case by stipulating, Jn effect,
that a congressional investigating com-
mittee, once the issue has been raised,
shall be th the final judge as to whether a
‘question asked a witness is pertinent to
the investigation. Some correction of.
this sort, if it can be done within con- |
stitutional limits, may well be necessary .
to insure the effectiveness gt congres- .
sional investigations.
& If ds clear that the third and fourth 4
‘provisions lie well within the authority of
ress. One deals with a ruling that .
Congress had intended to pre-empt the -
| field in dealing with subversive activ-”
| whether the issue is of sufficient im-
ities. The other involves a judicial -
interpretation of the intent of Congréss.——.
in passing the Smith Act, under which ~~,
several Communist leaders have been -
‘convicted. We do not see how there can -
be any argument respecting the right. .
of Congress to enact these provisiong, -
For if the court has misinterpreted the
intent of Congress, or if Congress falled
to make its intention clear, it-can hardly
be doubted that the nationgl legislature,
if !t thinks it is wise to do so, can adopt ~
corrective or clarifying laws. And these
ceftalily Will not kill the umpige.—~: +
XS
5 MAY 29 1958 SS
| }
ee ee
’
-
Se re ae ea
NOP LTE
73° MAY &S 1958
a Swe meee
Wash. Post and
Times Herald
Wash, News
Wash. Star Ale
N. Y. Herald __
Tribune
N.Y. Journal-
American
N, ¥. Mirror —
N. Y. Daily News
N. Y. Times
Daily Worker
The Worker —._—____
New Leader —_——_-—-
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic