Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 26
Page 5
5 / 116
—
4001 Gppeueve suiscuteuis as
important fields, such as”
bs rors by "dennar |
aa 4 he 3 ar
t & warning of of attempts to to
4 wcliypie the Supe that Poet
“EFEClL SPILE FW aue
it was sounded yesterda at t the
ual conference of the New
York Ctvil Liberties Union.
= he
warning was given
iD Dilliard, editorial writer
Bt. Louis Post-Dispatch,
he had received the Fiorina _
§@gker Civil Liberties Award af”
"$1,000 for outstanding work in
the field of cis of civi] liberties. -
Dilliard told the confer-
lence’s iuncheon session that
f€pmate Bill 2646, submitted by
Senator Wilteam E. Jenner, Re.
« to ceripple the Supreme
” because of recent rulings |
peaking
tel, Mr, Dilliard deciared that.
the Jenner bill “would have,
Onugress vindictively retaliate
against the Supreme Court for
some eight civil liberties de-f
eftions.” id
He said that’ the proposed
Aegislation would bar the court
(ina, annallatea tiriedictian in
Congressional investigations and
<hvernment employment in loy- |
alty investigations.”
- Court Make-Up Hailed
He sald the bill also would?
“WSck the Supreme Court out FF
in cases involving teachers and)”
lawyets caught in the same 4
net." Mr, Dilliard continued: ¥
“The proponents of the Jenner |g:
Pilland the many other pending r
attacks on the Supreme Court
would have the American peopie|
‘béliteve that our high bench
fey is packed with irresponsible|
wists of one reckless mind. i
"Actually the nine jurists whol:
mtake up our Supreme Court
ehidw are probably more repre-
sentative than the members of|
y, Rrevious Suprem. “4”
ch,” ,
A panel discussion o
este an va i and Favesdrd
Coen juncheon session.
tom tan Meany Weaskiaetar
ley J. Tracy, Washington \\~
atryer and former assistant
‘director of the Federal Bureau
qed. Inyestigation, said
d é@a!
=, threat to individual’
liberty, ut properly restricted,
{Rese activities are essential, if
indispensable, to both na-
onal and individual security.”
Edward EHennett “Williams,
eo of Law at Georgetown!
University and also a Washing-
den. lawyer, gaid that aithough
mgress had made it a crime
‘to tap telephones or to use in-
Qerthation obtained from taps,
“the Federal Bureau of Investl-
gation has been and ia contin-
usdsly engaged in this illicit;
MB a.
dey 135
TA
mtrolled wiretapping A A Le A
pping constitute a,
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic