Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 25
Page 26
26 / 55
|
sp me ee
a ON pee
O19 (Mev. 0-7-58)
C
y eon"
© JAN2 1958
Liat
d
‘Privilege’ in "4
Press Release
Wash nator
The Sopreme Court has di-
rected the U. 3. Court of Ap-
peala here to examine into the
question of “qualified privilege”
in sonnection with issuance of a
press felease Which the Jower
courts held libelous because It
was not absolutely privileged.
Damage awards totaling
$5,000 had been made in a suit
brought against William G, Barr
for igsuing a press releaae which
two government employees aid
defamed them. The high court,
without hearing argument, sug-
weated that the lower tribunals
weigh “conditional privilege” as
a defense.
The Justice Department had
sought a wider ruling: that the
interest of the public in govern-
mental operations requires s t
rule of absolute immunity from
libe! suita againgt persons acting i
in their official capacity.
Disputing the Appellate Court
statement that the press release ‘
might have been absolutely
privileged lf isaued by a Cabinet
officer, the Department of Jus-
tice argued:
“The rationale of the rule of F
immunity applies with equal i-
force to lesser officials who hold }
policy-making or ‘political’ posi- t
tlona, They, tec, should be free ¢
tions, ihey, too, should oe free
to explain their acts and policies
to the publie without fear of |.
defamation charges. Vigorous f:
performance of duties untram- /
meled by the fear of retaliation
by private damage actions ne-
cessitates the existence of the
privilege... . The result of the
decision, Uf allowed to stand,
will probably be... a curtail-
ment of information which the
public is entitled to and should
receive about contfoversial mat-
ters.”
_ The release iseued by Mr.
arr named two subordinates
as\sponsors of a terminal leave
payment plan denoenced by
three Senators as a “conspiracy
to defraud the government” and
a “raid on the treasury.”
The subordinates, Mra. Linda
A, Matteo and John J. Madigan,
aved for libel damages in Dia-
trict Court. Mrs. Matteo was
awarded §6,500 and Madigan
$2,000. The Court of Appeals ‘
voted 2-1 to uphold the awards, «
stating that Barr in explatning
to the puclic his decision ta sus-
pend the subordinates “went
outside his line of duty.”
eal
L
ti
ee ee ee Re EC
GIR 12.
Tolaon
Nichole
Boardman
Belmont
_ Mobr
Parsons
ie
TE
or DED
oT ‘RECOR
Metco Bhi 237
——
Wash. Post and
Times Herald
Wash. News
Wash. Star
N. Y. Herald
Tribune
N.Y. Journal-
American
N, Y. Mirror
N. ¥. Daily News
N.Y. Times
Dally Worker
The Worker
New resith
Date
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic