◆ SpookStack

pbyious errects-could ensié,” The family = have to pay Initiation fees and dues 4 ership and‘the union workers sent te: could insult their customers and, in . rove od emtaanai the food, break dishes ; , and otherwise sz’ motes Sig the business. Communtate were : ely to put a Hr busin minute cata j the ‘ eerste meen aS e, Pes to ‘Jantity “a Wrong™- Speaking for tHe court in 1943, Ane ted that the pickets told Hes about - the ‘eafeteria. Neverthéleas, he had the cold gall to assert that the” pitkets wére guilty of n@ wrong in lying about the cafe-; ; teria and the persons who owned it. For support of this | r decision which thus became ‘the law of the Isnd, Frank. ' i furter, who planted Alger Hiss ‘in the ‘Washington laby- ; rinth, relied on'the admitted fact. that unions had ~ Se ot ae ee ee Tignt 16 ‘Btate their case” and ta “make, ‘known, thie © facts.”. ~ However, in one of those. ‘precedents, by whictt Frankfurter tried-to justify an. indorsement of "as Melons, vicious, harmful slanders against innocent vic-' tims, the decision also provided that the siogans and outcries must be “truthful.” In the Cafeteria case, resort to Hes was not denied, But Frankfurter wrote’ that “to use loose language or undefined slogans that, are part of the conventional give and take in our c=" clst’ —1s not to. falsify facts.” 0%: a aon) . . Of course these Hes ‘were clearly in dad to de- stroy an honest enterprise of an American working family and that was absolutely clear to al! the brutal enemies of the American morality. And they dia fals~ ify the facts. ~ ‘ , All the New York courts had held that it was a tie! to say that the owners were “unfair” to organized Idbor, because the cafeteria had no employees; to say that. the cafeteria served bad food and to sey that customers: by thelr patronage alded “the cause of fascism.” The! pickets lied further, according to the New York courta,! in representing “that a strike was in progress.*--- ; To justify all this corruption, Frankfurter, and the Supreme Court of the United States, held that it wast wrong to deny “free speech. in the future” because ‘of: “Isolated incidents of abuse” in the previous record of ' that picket-itne, . . : a The effect which the union and the court desired + was to compel the cafeteria to hire union members, ~ For a long time, this nasty doctrine deterred law- yers for injured American individuals and firms from | seeking relief in junior courte. : ene ee a he 1 Judge Reverses | Hinself and Law ‘By WESTBROOK PECLER . j i 1 EME T has clamped another toehold {Ts pes furan m itself in hdldifig tat a union has no right to pick loyer to foreé him to drive his workers picket an emp ee lowér court decided that Local 695 } of the r tten Teamsters union was trying to make the Sane et a Wisconsin gravel pit do the unton’s dirty work, Wisconsin law forbids this as “coercion.” The muddy Federal Taft-Hartiey Law comes to the same ) natnt by relieving employers of the legal obiigation | yrersas auesw " {mposed by the old Wagner Act: to help the union. to snare the employees... i ; By bitter coincidence, the: majority opinion in this’ eo ween _ Now it is reversed until further notice, at ‘case was written by Felix Frankfurter, who wrote ex-, be Briefly,’ a union picketed a ‘cateteria ruh entirely * small “énterprises, loosely. known as “Mon and Pop*' O A 4 a g 4 an - LF _ , actly the opposite in the notorious Gateteria cae _ by members of a family who. ,ewned it and had ne * : employees outside the family, tn many cases affecting . * re demanding that the family mem- « =D eee ee eee wonting in thelr own employ and pw ' Om RRCORDED | ie CUPPING Y, (6 Fe7 du putelifers dispatch 4 from 1 JUL DATED — _— Vig,