◆ SpookStack

+ . . ate .- aoe Of Transcripts > f ' The Supreme Court rpied reste fay that 2% fT on conv Enanimous decision ifecting Jes the case to lower courts to permit Miller to file a new bill of excep tions with the Eighth Federal Cir- cuit Court so as to permit it to |’ determine whether there was suf- ficient evidence to sustain his con- yiction, “There is no law of the United States," Justice Roberts said, “creating the position of official | court stenographer and none re-! quiring the stenographle report of - any case, civil or criminal, and “ there is none providing for pay- ment for the services of a stenog- * rapher in reporting juridical pro-% Eeview Is Refused The opinion noted, however, that, “at the instance of the conference ° of senior court circuit judges, legis- Ietion has been introduced in Con-? gress to provide an official system of reporting and to defray the cost; 2 tid ‘ d e Standard Ol and a fled |3' yealeriar to obtain a aus Cc r o sion sustain-|-. ing a $409,819 Federal income “ deftclency for 80 a5-an outgrmech : of the famo ome R igases. Both the Board of Tax Appeals atid the Seventh Federal Circuit Court held that a $2,906,484 judg. ment against Stanolind Crude Oil! Ceo., « wholly-owned subsidiary, | was not uctible litigation, all tice » who prosec Tea- pot@ome for the Govermfnent, did not Patticipate ig yesterday's ac- n. . ; . | oO time in g Federal district court | ait] i : at f) "T+ wel ’ at re batim_stenographie transcript of L. the evidence a ublic 4 rto a Feder: it court. 4 Turtles se delivered the) y Y As DFC sa § 1942 i < Muc Whe Supreme Court for fraud.” . Signed By Fall. Sinlay +. and Harry F. Sinclair, president of - Mammoth. Stanolind, it added, 4 was incorporated in 1921 and was.” known until 1930 as the Sinclair ; Crude Oil Purchasing Co. - Among other actions, the Su-4 preme Court yesterday returned te ; the Federal district court at Chi-( eago litigation to determine? whether a labor organization which | submits a dispute to the National Railroad Adjustment Board may", not withdraw the controversy after: receiving information that an ad- verse ruling is to be delivered. . This action was taken because the death of the referee appointed. by the adjustment board to con; sider the controversy at issue. The; District Court was directed to take. “such further proceedings as be appropriate.” The five members of the labor, group on the first division of the board, which sits at Chicago, sought a Supreme Court review of a ruling by the Seventh Federal: Circuit Court directing the board to decide 170 disputes between the. Delaware & Hudson Railroad Corp. and employes over rates of pay. The railway employes had attempted to withdraw the disputes after the referee indicated what his conclusions would be. ff.” ay. Glavis > wees Mes Mr. Clege__ Mr. Nie Mr. Rose Mr. Tracy, Mr. Carsen__ - Mr. Coffey___ Mr. Hendon_____ Mr. Kramer_ Mr. McGulre_ nad ake er Rie Page