Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 18
Page 78
78 / 129
Soa eaten ance ee A Hot he pt RN I a I a I wae « .
—_
Agsoc, Iv:
. ra a Dep. £2 Acme
“ . . Rep. AS Ogee
Br, wlnited States Department of 4. dtice Aas —
ua We ee,
RES ogy, OFFICE FCR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE Fax
Sh ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE fee
~— . WASHINGTON, D.C, 20530 1m
ke nv
January 10, 1978 | Ra,
dowesss | Te-h Congo
MEMORANDUM TENERAL G ee Tech. ¢ Sen
\ Public Als Of
TO: Heads of Offices, Boards and Divisions | Telephone ka
. Drectci’s See'y.
FROM: Daniel J. Meador Om
Assistant Attorney General L
SUBJECT: Obligatory Appellate ‘Jurisdiction 7 1 Hee
of the Supreme Court
Attached for your consideration and comments is a
proposed bill which this Office “s Gevoleping fer submission
to the Attorney General, OMB, and Congress. Also attached
is a memorandum giving some of the background for the
proposal,
The effect of this legislation is to limit the oblig-
atory appellate jurisdicticn of the Supreme Court generally
to those cases involving the granting or denial of an
injunction by a three-judge district court. All other cases
would come to the Court on writ of certiorari to one of the
courts of appeals, the Court of Claims, the Court of Customs
d Patent Appeals, the highest court of a state, or the
“Supreme Court of Puerto Rico.
Obligatory appellate jurisdiction is ratained in these
cases decided by three-judge courts because, after the 1976
revision of the jurisdiction of such courts, relatively few
cases are still heard Ly three-judge courts, and since that As
revision is so recent we are reluctant to ask Congress to re-
open the question of three-judge courts at this time. Moreover,
if mandatory jurisdiction were removed fror these cases there
would be no appeal of right available unless one was created
in the courts of appeals. Courts of appeals review of these
cases would be peculiar in that one group of three judges would
be reviewing the decision of another group of three jucges,
and the latter would include one judge from the reviewing ‘court.
| nang st O2- 27 5f£5—A4S
Ray x-104 ee Ty (372.
ne) -
Poo _— ‘ . 7 SANG 1978 >
ENCY ok }
y ws ve Vv f
ve Net ad - sot r |
nent geen a,
TE NAG A Eas Mai VI, tae ET. pte UTEP eT Pe oF
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic