Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 18
Page 16
16 / 129
“Mohr 7
at +
. ; Bren.ig, ©...
~ ° Callahina
Casper
Conrad
. Dalbey
‘ , , . Felt
’ . ale -
osen vo
Tavel
Walters
Soyara
Tele. Room
Holmes
Gandy
0-20 (Rev. 2-2-71) ( a ' * - 3 ~ JA ( sult —
« \ P we
( C) : Richa;
Fa
i
UPI-82
(ROBBERY APPEAL?
| WASHINGTON--THE SUPREME COURT EXPRESSED EXTREME, AND SOM EVHAT
NUSUAL, IRRITATION TODAY AT THE JUSTICE DEPARTHENT AND A FEDERAL
JAPPEALS COURT TOR MISREPRESENTING THE FACTS IN A ROBBERY CAS&.
IS A UNANIMOUS, UNSIGNED OPINION, THE HIGH COURT DISHISSED A
\PAUPER'S APPEAL BY JANES MERMAN BOSTIC WHO DREW 25 YEARS IN JAIL IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ROBPERY OF THE BORDEAUX BRANCH OF THE CONMERCE
| UNION BAEK IN NASHVILLE IX 1567.
THE COURT SAID, IN EFFECT, THAT IT SHOULD NEVER HAVE TAKEN THz
poms {CASE AND THAT IT DID SO ON THE BASIS OF "THE MISTAKEN REPRESENTATION"
'MADE BY BOTH THE 6TH CIRCUIT COURT F APPEALS AND THE GOVERUNENT THAT
; BOSTICK (CORRECT) HAD BEEN CONVICTED CF THE OFFENSE OF CONSPIRACY TO
COMMIT HWRDERe. -
, iT IS NoT UNUSUAL FOR THE COURT TO DISMISS CASES ONCE IT HAS
‘AGREED TO HEAR THEM, HEARD ORAL ARGUMENT, AND THEN MET IN
|CONFERENCE TO DECIDE THE ISSUE. EUT BLANE IS NOT NORMALLY
ATTACHED FOR NISREPRESENTATION. .
, THE COURT SAID IT GRANTED THE APPEAL IN ORDER TO CONSIDER WHETHER
_ |THE APPEALS COURT HAD FERRED IN HOLDING THAT BOSTICK HAD PROPERLY
‘BEEN CONVICTED OF CONSPIRACY 10 CONMIT WERDER IN ORDER TO AVOID
iAPPPEMENSION FOR THE ROBBERY OF THE FEDERALLY INSURED BANK
, BOSTIC EAD ARGUED THAT LOWER COURTS WERE MISTAKEN IN FINDING KE
PCONTINUZD TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CONSPIRACY AFTER HIS ARREST AND THUS
“WAS RFSTONSIELE FOR THE ACTIONS OF HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS IN KILLING ORE
\URMDER CF THE GROUP WHO HAD BEEN TALKING TO .THE FBIe
\ THE HIGH COURT FOUND STATEMENTS IN THE APPEALLATE COURT*S OPINION
LAND IM THE MEMORANDUM OF THE UNITED STATES "WERE ERRONEOUS, AND THAT
THE FACTS ARE NOT AS WE BELIEVED THEM TO BE AT THE TIME WE GRANTED
| ‘THE WRIT."
. Behan GE/NWLZO4PED
WASHINGTON CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE
ENOL SUS
es ea
' .
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic