◆ SpookStack

u J Finally, Dash notes in his Foreword that" "The Institute is pursuing a number of research projects aimed at developing empirical data on the functioning of the various steps of the criminal process. Of relevance to the Miranda decision fea eteray which ctartad Tina 1 TORE af the attifidae and raennnasa ae Oe TEU OPV AAW GLEE ED UF LLLID Ly au, We LAD GLEALMUD ES Glilt A Te pVviilve of indigent defendants to police warnings as to their right to remain Silent and the right to have a lawyer appointed and be present with them in the station house. This study is uniquely timed to observe at the outset the unfolding problems of implementing the Supreme Court guidelines. " 3. Special Purpose of Publication The special purpose of this publication is to "illuminate the appellate process" for practicing lawyers, the public and law teachers. The method employed by the Institute to achieve this purpose is through the reprinting in this publication of appeals materials such as the briefs filed by the lawyers for the petitioners, respondents and amici curiae and the transcripts of the oral arguments in the Supreme Court in the Post-Escobedo Cases. The Institute of Criminal Law and Procedure is described aS an institute which was "established as an integral part of the Georgetown University Law Center in October, 1965, for a five-year period, under a million-dollar grant from the Ford Foundation. A principal mission of the Institute will be to engage in systematic studies of the criminal law process from‘police investigation practices to appellate and other post-conviction procedures'’. This particular publication is described as "Studies of the Criminal Process - No. 1". 4, Contents of Publication There is nothing new and practically no original scholarly research or writing in the whole publication. Its 339 pages consist almost solely of reprints. For example, among these reprints are the women ME Ses = following: a) The full opinion of the Court in Escobedo (24 pages). b) The full opinion of the Court in Miranda (111 pages). c) The full opinion of the Court in Johnson (16 pages). -4-