◆ SpookStack

OFTIOW AL PORNO, 18 rm, 2010-106 mat 1942 ECITION 1 o6a, Grn, 0, wo. 2? UNITED STATES co" RNMENT Tolson : DeLoach Mohr — Memorandum ei Gale : Rosen ——__.— TO : Mr. Mohr DATE: August 12, 1966 Sullivan —— Trotter Wick ———___— . Tele, Room J. J. Caspe / fmee er f VGAGY ene 7 \ REVIEW OF PUBLICATION ENTITLED "FROM ESCOBEDO TO MIRANDA - THE ANATOMY OF A SUPREME COURT DECISION" BY RICHARD J. MEDALIE (339 Pages) LERNER LAW BOOK CO., INC., 1966 WASHINGTON, D. C. AFSTOMMT T ANITAAATTC NLL DAN GWU - —J) BACKGROUND Washington Post article (8/7/66) captioned "Georgetown Professor Raps New Rules on Evidence" reported that Samuel Dash, Director, Institute of Criminal Law and Procedure, Georgetown TIiniveres vw Taur Monto hal itinignd them, moa Mrnurt fan eaotri Wibavuad Sity Lh W Venter nad cr 1L1ICIZea Lic wupr eme a Serring “almost arbitrary deadlines" and producing “ironic” and "discriminatory" results in its recent decision in Johnson v. New Jersey (6/20/66) holding that the Escobedo Opinion (6/22/64) and the Miranda Opinion {6/19 /RR\ ara tn he annliad anly nrnenacrtivaly tna triale hamin after \wy ays wwe ema FW WD appsscu Waal y¥ Ke Wee ewer way iy Gh SSE AOD? Mis ak Cth ee June 22, 1964, and June 13, 1966, respectively. The Post article noted that Dash’s criticism was found in | his Foreword to a new Institute publication compiled by Richard J. Medalie, Deputy Director of the Institute, entitled "From Escobedo to Miranda - The Anatomy of a Supreme Court Decision". \ Pursua ant to —- 4 y 7 D 8 =< =) am wn oO Oo pas °3 a) =| er o i =. rg oO of fo My ic. oO i_ ® . & AUG 25N965 9 RUN Sead — wor oR losure’ ov ae Een wv _ an a _v C4-RISSS- SAD les): \ NOT RECORDED 57 AUG 23 1966 me hOS 19.1986