◆ SpookStack

Barenblatt v. J. 5,, 26 Lu, 243 (1958; eert, granted 26 L.W. $297 (1956)) Questions presented fu this case are: (I) Did Congress authorize House Committee ox Un-dmerican Activities te investigate Communist activities in field af education. (2) Are statute and resolation extablisking Committee veid fer vagueness, and do they abridge freedom of speeck and pelitical and academic assecietion, fail to inform witness of neture and cause of accusation against him, and igvade powers reserved to peeple, in vielation of ist, 6th, Mth, snd 10th Amendments. (3) Did Committee fail te apprise witness ef subject matter of fuvestigation and pertimency of investigation, and was its {mquiry for unlawfel purpose ef exposing witness, thereby vitiating comtempt conviction, Scbleich v, Butterfield (1958) 356 0.5. 971 Alien brought actias against the District Directer of Immigration and Naturalization to review « final erder of deportation. The U. S. District Court (E.D. Nich.) 148 F, Supp. 44, entered summary Judgment is favor of the District Director and alies ap aled The irre aa Court ef Appeals held that evidence was sufficient to establish "meaasing- ful association” by aliex with Communist Party and to show that he joined the Communist Party, aware that he was joining an organization known as tle Communist Party, which operated as a distinct and active political organization, and that he did so ef his own free will, so as to justify