◆ SpookStack

ee eT ane Chaath ove Ponmeted State. Evidently, Congresses intended te prevent tranapertation in inter: atate oor foreyen eaduteree of pereons whe were heart unlawfully reathictee) anoorder that the captor might secure seme bene t te Homeeif Amd this om adevpuately eqpeescad Ba th oo orb oof th. enactment The rite ofc peacde om gemeris, Mdatle rtnds emtale le x onde an mstrinmentabty for ascertaining the correct meaning of words when there isunecertaints Ordinarily at himite verona! terres whieh fei Tow epee iii one fie trem tte srmilar te: thee mywecrtiad hort gf mas aot be ned te defeat the obvious purgese of degistetion Nin white geval statutes are narcowls eonstiaed. thin does hot require rejection of that eenee of the words whieh best harccsrzen with the contest and the endian stew Mt States 0 Magee fi Wall TA OO duds VO Nnalaece Pace €a, Te boos bay ds, Pasted States Biify, 206 TOS We Sb Pte Seater Wee eT wi OR 06-01, a2 Holding an offeer te prevent the captors arrest is sauethins shone with the etpectation of bereht to the tratayresaser So alee nol the same, are simular tn thea general nature and the deare te wecaee either of thom may lead to kideapirg V2 the word roward. as commonly umnderstond, monet itself broad enough to inelade Yenefita expected to follow the prevention ef an areat, they Fall within the broad term. ‘“‘otherwine'’. The words “exeept in eqee cf qominer, by ao paroat thor fl” emphasize the intended rrault of the enactment. They indicate legulative naderstanding that in their abeence a parent, who car. ried bin chiid away breause of, affection, might subject himeelf to contlemnation of the statute, Brawa v. Marylou), 12 Wheaton, 415, 438 Roth questions must be answered in the affirmative i: Kida png with par pee tee ead dedi Thee dea Fits, eda ade