◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 7

107 pages · May 11, 2026 · Document date: Feb 22, 1937 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Supreme Court · 106 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
Prof. Molay,pge 6e I am enclosing a separate memorandum containing excerpts from cases under the extradition clause, which you may read if you deatre.. Although the question of Federal authority to apprehend and deliver up fugitives was not directly involved in any of them,th2y support,at least jn & general way,the theories I have adivanced,Snrmarized briefly,they old: Ist.-That the constitutions! provision fs net self-executing b but depends upon congressional enactments: d \- | end.- That the power of Congress to enforce such provision is ; " exclusive of State action,to the extont that the subject is cowered by congressicnal iegisiation: Zrd,= That any omission of Congress to exercise its fell con- stitutional powers leavos the matters unprovided for subject to State authority : 4th,= That Congress nay,by further legislation, bring the en- tire subject matter exclusively under national authority: Bth — Miat’ +a aenta abtaal a ewteian @e #2 jsaneaune Pha ae Oo) WAM whe Wie, WE hOB ok VWF FV ee surrender of persons accused of crime,and the courts of the Union should liberally construe the provision to the end of preventing fugitives from —_ finding immmity from prosecution by seeking shelter in another State. Upon the foregoing principles,i believe the Federal Government has authority under the Constitution to set up and maintain a police agen _ cy in all of the Statos for the purpose of apprehending and delivering up fugitives from Justice without intruding upon the ordinary police pow ers of the States.Such agoncy would also have jurisdiction to make ar= _— rests for Violations of Federal laws,but would lack authority to make ar Vy) ooo rests unier the laws of the States.However, I see no reason why it could be coordinated with State scerctes in the work of crime detection,so as to render both more effoctive.I have noted the proposal of Senator Copee ROLL kD Tee NS oe Ake Web Wh MTU RD ee hood LOUMELR& BUY ld UAUE YD Pei ee is said to have the approval of our Attorney General and his able assist : ant, lir. Keonan,under which the Governor of exch State would recommend @ | for appointment te the Federal Bureau a representative for his State, who would be paid by the Federal Government, but wio,as a “dollarwaeyear"men | for the State, would be able to-utilize local police officers to work with the Federal Burean in crime detection.The merit of this plan is obe a, vious and I most heartily favor it, unisss a firmer tasis can be found : for the national agency.The wealmess of the plan,as I see it,lies in the ‘ assumption that a Federal agency of that character can exiat only by consent ef the States, and its success would be dependent upon the de-' gree of cooperation received from the warions State authoritles.Indeed, ——_ I om inclined to believe that State lerislation mizht be required te vaildate the acts of a voluntoer organization of that character.On the other hand,if the extradition clause gives Congress authority to sstab= lish a national agency to apprehend und deliver up fugitives, Congress, or the administrative bureau,could make all cooperative arrangements with local police officiala that could be realized under the Copeland plan,and then,if any State should lag behind or fail to cooperate, 6e
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 68
Jump straight to page 68 of 107.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic