◆ SpookStack

Appleyamt v Massachusette, 203 Po.l163t "A person charged by indict = 3~ tained in the Act of 793, 1 Stat.at L.302, ever since con- tinued in force,and nov embodied in sections 5278 end 5279 of the Revised statutes, h.s established the validity of ita logislat ton om the subject. "This duty of providing vy law", said Chief Justice Tanay, delivering the opinion of the Court in Kentucky v Dannison, 24 How,104 (65 U.Se, 16 L.ed.717,7B), *the regula ti ons necessary to carry od comm ot inta exe@ition, frm the natura ar tha duty and the object in view, was "manifestly devolved upon Con~ gress, for if it was left to the States,each State mirht require different procf to authenticate the judicial proceed= ings upon “hich the demand was founded, and as the aut of the Governor of the State where the Pagktive-wes 3 ia, in on “he cald not lawfully issue a warrant to arrest an in vidual without a law of the Stata ar of Congresa ta aut cornice 1+” - 1.0.1633 trate with the commission by ibs laws, and who, af Crime. loaves the State nor under what belfLef-be the time of such leavine and <1thin the meaning of *2 Stibtution ond the laws of ‘hne UnitedStatos, a fugitiv fron ‘faatice,and | if found in mother Stace cust be Jeligerst-up by tia Jovemor of such State to the State whose laws are ai, exed\ty have been violated,on the production of h indictme or affidsvit,certified es authen= 4ie by the Go nor of the te from which the accused de- parted. Such ia \the command the supreme law of the landg which may not te\disregarded/by any State. tate of a crime covered of the comission of such r what purpose or motivee LM ist on relating to fucitives from jua tice the h history y of its adoption will show, is in the of a tre atipuletion entered into for thu purpose pteand efficient administration of the he several states, an object of the first le of the entire *eount and woilen each con Sia fidelity to tis Constitution to roco7nlzé@e A fal “‘Orous enforcement of that stipulation is.vital to the y and welfare of the States ,and while a State should take oare.vithin the lintts of the law,thet the richts of tts people are protected against ills gal action, the {udi = ¢1al authorities ar ins Union should e: take care a ct onstitution be ue so narrowly interes rreted @ z to Sore OFF: andars eeainet the ee SP aT SES Fo fird a a petmanent esy lun in the territory of anothar State Ge "In Roberts v.Heil:y,ll16 U.s.50, 95,97, 29 L,04.644,540, 6 Sup»Ct Hep.29l, thia Court said thet the Act of Con; ress ,S€Ce 5273 of the Revised Statutes.made it toe cvty of the axceutive authority of the State in which is found « pereon charred with crime ogainst the lawe of another State,and who hoes fled from ee