◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 5

77 pages · May 11, 2026 · Document date: Aug 22, 1960 · Broad topic: Cold War & Communism · Topic: Supreme Court · 76 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
heed — §$tates’ Union Restrictive Laws to Be Fought in Highest Court By FRED W. PERKINS ivity in union-restrictive legislation is sure this winter on Capitol Hill, even tho there is no wertainty that Congress will follow thru on broad hints from the War Labor Board that , nike preventatives may become necessary, . ; tan the plaza from the Capitol is the marble home of the Supreme Court, and in that dis- tinguished edifice will be staged onejor more legal battles to knock out, on the ground o | Viola- ‘ tion of the Federai Constitution, th union-regulatory laws recently placed on the books of Colo- | yado, Kansas, Texas, Ajabama, Florida, Nortt( Dakota and Idaho. ' First action before the (Supreme* , tutional | Sra ateris mich «| Award for Missing Airman - More Bans} - nin Congress We** We Ufa 3/y 3] Va | | | Thomas, president of the United Auto- mobile Workers (CIO), succeeded in having himself arrested thru challeng- . ing in a public speech that state's re- ‘ . quirement of a Heense for solicitors of at t union memberships, An appeal from the Texas Supreme Court is now being perfected by Lee Pressman and Fugens Basses, BAHIA. Luuuocs ald assistant General counsel respectively of the OIO, and is to be filed within 16 days, REPLY ON RECENT RULING The CIO. lawyers, aecording to Mr. Pressman, will base an important part of their case on the Supreme Court's | refusal on Oct. 18 to review a lower | court decision which had held that od the National Labor Relations Act does : he not forbid an employer from using the ane : tonstitutional right of free speech in! -= giving his employes his views on} whether they should vote for union yepresentation. ; “ee The free speech issue, Mr. Pressman | said, is alsa the basis of the Thomas | case in Texas. The rule must work | ny ‘ both ways, he asserted, : * Litigation of the same sort ts on! also in Colorado, where some of the! state law restricting union activity has: —_—— _ fer F - ~— been declared unconstitutional by a. a Jower state court, and the question is a now on appeal to the state Supreme gressignal Medal ‘of ]) Court. This case, like those invalying a a. all cther state statutes which unionists; Hofer to the family o . Jac in acon sinck by took . a assert are discriminatory against them, part in the famous rald ove . st\summe ~~ é is thought likely to come to Washing- : ~ ton before it is finally settled, unless| father, Arthur Jerstad, recelves the award ag the mother and sister Jook the Supreme Court issues a blanket decision to settle the question on a], nation-wide basis. 10 CARRY ON FIGHT ‘ Union leaders are Preparing to com- —_ bat threatened attempts at anti-union i legislation In other states where legis- latures meet this winter. Mr’ Pregs- ff Christ lan- (lmerican Association pn S009 EY fA - eh man said that “the organization that 8 sponsored these bills is not confinin : itself ta these even states.” He ch d that the state laws were the result of a general campaign by the “Christian Americans,” which he sai was directed # by Sen. Lee O'Daniel (B., Tex.}, with “plenty of funds ebtained from the oN National Association of Manufacturers and other organizationg of that kind,’ The Christian Americans, sald Mr. Pressman, “ls Just a name for the same group of organizations and people that nes have been fighting us down thru the = ys Ja = a years. They have discovered In a state act the means of overcoming the united strength we can present agains* that kind of legislation before Congress... We are not so strong in some of t particular states, where, they cater tis \ rapping.” im | We
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 65
Jump straight to page 65 of 77.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the Cold War & Communism archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
Related subtopics
Daily Worker
5 documents · 305 known pages
Subtopic
I Was a Communist for the FBI Motion Picture
3 documents · 76 known pages
Subtopic
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg
2 documents · 178 known pages
Subtopic
Life Status Research List
2 documents · 889 known pages
Subtopic
Ali Hasan Al Majid Al Tikriti Chemical Ali
1 documents · 53 known pages
Subtopic
Cpusa-Negro Quest
1 documents · 98 known pages
Subtopic