Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 5
Page 42
42 / 77
——
er eee
|
The Decline
Of the Lawyer
: By Mox Lerner
Pa
i The lawyers of America, {n conventio mbled, have de-
clared their strong suspicion that the U. S upreme Court is
soft on Communists, and their conviction twhe way to keep
it from further serious mischief is for Congress to rewrite the
laws so that any foot—including the Sune. ES our fools—can
understand their intent.
Doubtless the committpé) chairman, Peter Le “Brown,
and the other framers of t erican Bay Assn. resolutions will
regard my summary as too crude and rassknuckled. . To be sure,
IT have not reprinted any of their nice-nellyisms, such as hailing
.the judges as “the ultimate guardians of the Bill of Rights ard
the protectors of our freedom.” But these silken werds are woven
into a mask, and our business ag ee Jt to. aoe through
the mask, ib sto gg 4G
I have struggled through the “wherefses” and peas utherot
and the “be it resolveds’—over a thousand tortured words of them
“and I can only report that they add up toa slap In the face for the
court.
; * 4 % _
Chiet Justice Warren, who resigned from the Bar Assn. last
fail! and has rebuffed all pleas to reconsider, knew the | temper
anda wiasle af faann leaureane ete peak penne foe
aia OunIgOR VL LTS law ycis. I LAL MLC fe LU his com-
mentary on them than for their commentary on him.
He might have fobbed them off with hypocrisies, but the same
forthright quality that he has shown in his great civil liberties and
civil rights decisions, he shows in this particular gesture,
There are some who feel that the resolutions might have
been much worse. They cite two scores on which the lawyers.
pulled thelr punches—first, In disapproving any proposals to strip
the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over certaln. cases; second,
in striking out a clause about “technicalities* which are “invoked
against the protection of our nation.” Jt would Lave been curious |
Indeed if a profession which has grown rick on technicalities
should dismiss the procedural protections of. due process and the
Bill of Rights as “technicalities” to ye swept away fa the: ‘argency
.to punish hated men. :
This may: have been in Chief Jiistice Warren's’ mind when, after -
the lawyers assigned as counsel for the Communist spy, Rudolph |
Abel, had completed their appeal argument based on a procedural
“technicality,” he thanked them for their public service tn undertal-:
ing a case “which normally would be offensive” ta them. “Feast
dustice Warren not to miss the revealing gesture. = agement
fi Tin -
rec 58 7% = / —
— le
/ TMP FRA
pe —aa
Holloman
— ‘ed ——..
The Washington Post and
Times Herald
The Washington Daily News
The Evening Star
New York Herald Tribune
New York Journal-Amefican ___
New York Mirror
New York Daily News
New York Post
ES
The New York Times
The Worker
The New Leader
.
es
The Wall Street jouma
Date
a
tot
FEB 27 ja5>
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic