Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 4
Page 52
52 / 78
her. 1
tee.’
py ; Deceaber 15, 1937
LEEMORAMB! FOR UR. TAMA
C ne: with
b 9 apes ~ ITIVEs
PAROLE VIOLATOR. .
Duriag the course of an investigation sontucted by
the New York offi the ae of bringing about the
apprehension of for violation of parole
Special Arent contacted Probation Officer
ce: advised that there is presently pending before
od wl PRaAt yprems Court the case entitled "UNITED
STATE versu a| PRADD" which involves many legal questions
relating to parolees who fail to contact their{parole officers,
by poe Probation Officer, advised that a decision
in this case is expected within the imiediate future,
Thies satter is drought to your attention, inasmuch ‘
as it is felt thet the decision rendered in this case might ,
possibly be of interest to the Bureau,
Respectfully,
> ron NM Awd o, Lane ~ Rn
. .
ain de ee a
RECOR -DED waeieoTe Ge
INDEED
OSTA TYNIDIWO
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
bureau
Related subtopics