Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 2
Page 33
33 / 112
~ _
87 to Go to Jail, |
y-seven of the 02 strikers
whom the labor board ordered re-
instated Were convicted, of colt
tempt of gourt in defying an in-
junction fo evacuate plants
and sentenced to jail terms rang:
ing from 10 to 180 days. Their
jast legal resort Having been ex-
hausted, they now must serve the
sentences.
Ta the other two Wagner act
‘cases, the court held that there
Was DO evidetice to mistain the
fooard’s finding that the Colum-
blan Enameling and Stamping
Company, cf Terre Haute, Ind.,
and the Sands Manufacturing
Company, of Cleveland, Ghio. re-
fused to bargain collectively with
their employes.
It upheld decisions setting aside
the board's orders to reinstate
discharged employes with back
\pay.
Five Straight Losses
Including these decisions, the
labor board has lost five major
cases in a Tow at the preses” term
\of the Bybreme Court. in the
‘Consolida d Edison Company
ease (New York) the Coutt con-
j
9 far 8)
c ba eee
a
on ©ruge 2, U6
id the board's order in 0 o far a
gemnec as arbitrary and unlawful |* requ e company to bargain
the board’s attempt to abrogats | Collectively with Lodge 66 of the
an,American Federation of Labor | #rueleamated Association of Iron,
gontract for the purpese of in- Steel & Tin Workers, me Fro.
faauling & Cc. I. oO. union, In re y
using review the Peninsular! Election O 4
and Occidental Steamship Com-| rdered vo
“In view of the change the
;Pany case (Florida) the Court
thwarted eftorts of the labor board | situation by reason of the valid
© reinstate, with back pay, C.1.O./ discharge of the ‘sitdown’ strikers
seamen who engaged in mutinouSignd the filling of positions with |
sitdown strikes.
new men, we see no basis for a
conclusion that after the resump- |
flon of work Lodge 66 was the|
The Supreme Court divided five| choice of a majority of respond-|
to two in each of the three Labor | @0t’s employes for the purpose of
Board cases decided yesterday. collective bargaining,” gaid the
Neither Justice Louis D. Brandeis,| Pinion by Chief Justice Hughes.
who retired two weeks ago, nor) Whether the Rare Metal Work-
Justice Felix Frankfurter, who) TS of America, Local No, 1, or the;
too’ his seat on the bench a month/©-1-0. union, represents a major-
:Ago took part in the consideration| ity of the employes {s a question
or decision of the cases. Justices) hich the board must determine.
Hugo L. Black and Stanley F.! by Means of an election, the court!
Reed, both Roosevelt appointees, held.
diseanted in all three cases, hold- But the court found that the,
ing in effect that the majority|COmpany violated the Wagner act)
opinions nullified the purposes of | bY Tefusing to bargain collectively |
the Wagner act. with the C.1.0, union prior to the:
In the Fansteel case, the Su-|Sitdown strike, which began on
preme Court upheld the labor| February 17, 1937.
board's order in so far as it rej am yp
quired the company to cease and; “SEF \
desist from Interfering with the
Tight of its employes to organize
Black, Reed Dissent
8 In the Columbian case, Justice
and b : tone, delivering the majority!
P ho collectively. finding, said that the court could
artiall held not find substantial evidence to’
y P sustain the board’s finding that
It upheld that part of the! the enameling company had re
board's onger requiring the com-|fused to bargain collectively.
pany to / withdraw recognition| Justice Owen J. Roberts, hand. '
from the Yare Metal Workers of|ing down the majority opinion in.
America, Local No. 1, which was'the Sands case, heid that there |
formed after the CLO. sitdown! was not a “scintilia” of evidence
+7 +
strike. The opinion held that there/te show that the company’s un-|
was evidence to support the/fair labor practices precipitated.
board's contention that the com-|trouble at its plant. On the con-'
pany promoted the formation ofitrary, he found that the company’
this union. in violation of the|had deasit “freely and candidly’
Waener Act. With the Mechanics Educational
The court, however, did not up| Society of Americas.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic