◆ SpookStack

'.~ .lI92 ,4; LA 9-2U98 not identical fingerprints four individuals whose fingerprints were submitted for elimination purposes. Inked palm prints these persons not available. Latent fingerprint on Q20 also compared, insofar as com- parable areas of the latents would permit, without effecting an identification with latent fingerprints previously reported this case. Latent fingerprint on Q20 searched single fingerprint file without effecting an identification. No latents of value developed on two-page letter, designated Q21 and Q22. One latent fingerprint previousl re umed ,, on Q13 identified as finger impression 1 Seven other latent fingerprints previous y rep e also compared, insofar as possible, without effecting an identification with the submitted elimination finger- prints. Some of the inked finger impressions not clearly or fully recorded so as to permit complete and conclu- sive comparisons. In addition, the seven latent finger- prints were compared with each other with the following results: Two fingerprints on Q4 identical each other. Two fingerprints on Q7 identical each other. - 63¢ -