Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Stanley Levison — Part 3
Page 82
82 / 132
SPE PRATER ROAR we NT re ab ee Rep
Re: Communist Party, United States C
of America - Negro Question ws T
Communist Influence in Racial Matters
internal Security - C
he would like to have Bayard Rustin attend. King explained
that he felt this affair would be very valuable in that they
could sit down and really discuss the program, King went on
to explain that this would not be an administrative meeting
@s such, although he said some administrative matters might
come up during that period, King said that it will mainly be
looking at the program for 1964, and looking over 1953. He
Said that 1t will be "a where do we go from here discussion",
King indicated that the affair would begin on January 6, 1964,
at noon and that it would last until January 8, 1964, at noon.
King suggested that it would cost approximately $2,500 for the
retreat, and he stated that ne feels the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference (SCLC) treasury cannot handle it at this
time. Jones agreed with this and said that this is something
the Gandhi Society can and snould do. King suggested that Jones
discuss this with Wachtel in order to get his views. King
repeated that he would like to have Jones and Wachtel come,
and he remarked that even if they brought their wives it would
be a good break for a Gay or two,
Jones mentioned to King that arguments before the
United States Supreme Court in regard to the “libel case" are
scheduled for January 6, 1964. He also mentioned that the
arguments involve "The New York Times" and the individual
tt tl
defendants who signed "the ad". Jones told King that Wilitam FP.
Rogers, the former Attorney General, and Sam‘Pierce are doing
the oral argument and that Harry and himself were counsel and -
would be advising them during the argument.
Jones told King that he had been contacted by a
representative of a Federal Agency who spoke to him about
Arthur Kinoy's relationship with the SCLC, and Jones said
that he told him he knew nothing about it. Jones said he
mentioned that Kinoy was just an attorney with whom he had
worked at one time. Jones said that the questions "assumed
an organizational link which does not exist". King commented
that “it is very important for us to clear that up because
there is no connection other than indirectly through Bill".
King reminded Jones that "we made the decision on that - how
we would deal with it".
ee mR ee
PR Sen ae NP aR pene ee ee ge tae oe em amenete meer
Te beet BEL ge ate ee baleen ata ep AES Lean peggy te alee on ee er Sen Scare meer Sonata Mat ‘ek Ahh A ak ee
“gfe 0
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic