Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Spiro Agnew — Part 17
Page 31
31 / 182
Memorandum to Mr. Gebhardt
RE: DALE ANDERSON
6. The article states that Wolff was asked to take the
lie detector test after a visit to Baltimore ten days ago by
Assistant Attorney General Henry E. Petersen.
The Bureau has no knowledge as to when Wolff was
requested to take the polygraph examination. Assistant Attorney
General Petersen advised Section Chief Long that he would
personally interview Wolff at Baltimore on 8/15/73 and would
need the results of the polygraph examination as conducted by
Pearce& Other than this we have no knowledge that Petersen had
spent two days with Beall reviewing the case against Agnew and
that he had questioned witnesses in this case. * A627 Fu gvis kheO
Tohim BY FB...
7. The article states it was learned yesterday that
Paul Gaudreau, President of a Baltimore architecture firm who
had been granted immunity, had been asked to take the lie detector
test.
We have no knowledge concerning this comment.
8. The article states it was not known whether Lester Matz,
the Baltimore engineering consultant, who has been given imnunity,
has been asked to take a similar test.
As previously indicated, Matz was afforded a polygraph
examination by SA Pearce on 8/12/73.
9. The article points out that during his visit to Baltimore,
Petersen went over much of the material that Beall and his invest-
igators have gathered in their nine month investigation into
corruption in Baltimore County.
The Bureau has absolutely no knowledge concerning this
comment.
10. According to the article Petersen also questioned Matz
about his allegations that he personally gave money to Agnew.
We have no knowledge concerning this remark.
11. According to the article, sources have said that Matz
has told investigators that he turned over $2,500 to Agnew.
We have no knowledge with reference to this comment. It
is noted, however, during the polygraph examinati bT7]
SA Pearce on 8/12/73 he was asked the question
|
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic