◆ SpookStack

@ : o UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION FILED APR L 2 1988 EYVON MENDENHALL > U.S. DISTRICT COU “EL Die fp OF Moe SYLVESTER JONES, Plaintiff, vs. No. 88-255C(1) CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM This pro se in forma pauperis civil rights action is now before the Court for frivolity review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(d). Plaintiff brings this action against numerous defendants including the City of St. Louis, the Counties of Clayton, Bridgeton and Northwoods, various city, county and state agencies and officials, private attorneys, unknown police officers and federal agents, and the General Motors Acceptance Corporation Board of Directors. Plaintiff alleges that defendants unlawfully seized peoperty from his home and business and conspired together to manufacture criminal charges against him and to falsely arrest and maliciously prosecute him in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§1981, 1982, 1983, and 1985(3). Plaintiff brought a previous civil rights action pursuant to §§1981, 1982, 1983, 1985(3), and 1988 against the same defendants, or those in privity with the defendants in the present action, complaining of the same incidents and same violations of his constitutional rights as alleged in the present case. See Jones v. City of St. Louis, et al., No. 87-844C(1) (E.D.Mo. June 19, 1987), appeal dismissed as frivolous, No. 87-2070 (8th Cir. Oct. 16,- 1987), cert. denied, 108 S.Ct. 508 (1987). In the previous action, this Court dismissed plaintiff's complaint as frivolous on the basis of collateral estoppel, the Missouri five year statute of limitations, and plaintiff's failure to state a conspiracy APPENDix- /Y