◆ SpookStack

Foster-—Miller,Inc.vs.Babcock & Wilcox Canada, 46 F 3d 138 (lst Cir.1995),discussing three(3) levels of inquiry under Rule 12(b)(2). When personal jurisdiction is challenged by motion or responsive pleading,and absent a factfinging by the court,the court generally draws all reasonable inferences and resolves all factual disputes in fav- or of the party invoking federal jurisdiction. And that person,the Appellant,not the Appellees,whom had no say in the court/Appellee judge's action in this case.Exactly what level of inquiry made by district judge,Stiehl herein ? [28 U.S.C. § 455 et seq.] As a result of three(3) previous Hate Crimes Order/Rulings by district judge,William D.Stiehl/Appellee herein,against Appellant's Civil and Constitutional Rights,Privileges and Immunities,in Complaints,see Appendix(H),attached hereto,App- ellant filed with the complaint,Motion pursuant to 28 USC 8 455 et seq.,See copy of the same in the record,transmitted to this Circuit,requesting that judge,Stiehl,disqualify himself, and asked that the case by assign another judge,and that App- ellant be notified if he may proceed with his obligation under Rule 4(c)(1)(m),Fed.R.Civ.P.,Furthermore,the motion were prior to the Clerk assigning the case to any judge,however,disregar- ding the Motion,and the statute itself which states in part: (a) Any justice,judge,or magistrate of the United States shall disqualify himself in any procee- ding in which his impartiality M-I-G-H-T rea-— sonably by questioned." Whether or not to disqualify himself were not left solely upon the judge,on the contrary,the party making the challenge, but Appellee,Stiehl had himself assigned this case,for the sole ~31-