◆ SpookStack

ory guidelines Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000 et seq.) and expanding the scope of relevant civil rights statutes in order to provide adequate protection to Victims of Discrimi- nation.Congress call this Act [ The 1991 Civil Rights Act ] The United States Supreme Court had the gall to knowingly set forth falsely manufacturedL-I-E(S) and criminal Decept— ions in its opinion bypassed Overwhelming—Documentation Evi- dence for the sole purpose coverup and conceal the crimes set out above,by issuing fraudulent opinion in Jones _vs.ABC TV Network,et al.,No.95-7186 Decided February 26,1996,ordered clerk of court to return all pleadings to Appellant,the rest of his life,comes to the Court,with Motion for leave to pro- ceed in Forma Pauperis,that only file pleadings accompanied py [ $300.00 filing fee and 40 copies each of petition and 40 copies each of any Joint appendices,and prove of service upon each Respondent ] That Appeilant does not have the right to petition the court for permission to proceed in forma pau- peris,This criminal conduct is not interpretation of the Con- stitution,on the contrary,[ Legislation from the Bench ] that exceeds ali authority under Article III of the Constitution, and a criminal act against the Civil and Constitutional rights of Appellant,absolute immunity is in fact Unconstitutional. 4(B)~Appellees,Suter,clerk of U.S.Supreme Court,did conspi- re with deputies clerks,Troy D.Cahill,Christophen W.Vasil, Ellen Brondfield,and Appellees,Justices ,and an agreement we- re made to [ Instead of Docketing Petition(S) entitle: Jones vs.Sharp Electronics Corp.; Jones vs.Chris Weatherford,Assist. -20~