◆ SpookStack

» dence of ongoing Covérup,that these officers of the Governm-~ ent knew of these crimes,and concealed them,and aided and abated continuing commission of these Class A Felony Crimes. Federal judges acting without subject matter jurisdiction ov- er the action,;are liable for money damages under Stump vs. Sparkman, 435 US 349,55 L Ed 2d 331,98 S Ct 1099(1978),and the presiding judges,William D.Stiehi,did continued the on- going multitude Conspiracies and Overt Acts/Crimes against Appellant,other Citizens and Laws of the United States,acted in similar manner by Unconstitutionally Sua Sponte Dismissed this Complaint W-I-T-H - P~R-E-J-U-D-I-C=-E in favor of all Defendant,claiming lack of Jurisdiction,a willing member of the coverup,these crimes against American's Consumers, That judge,Stiehl,had duty as federal judge,and citizen of the United States to report crimes,not conspire with the crimin-~ als in an ongoing coverup to conceal these crimes by inter, alia,denying Appellant access to Court,right to Sue SEC,See Jones vs.Alfred H.Mayer Co., 392 US 409,88 S Ct 2186,20 L Ed 2d 1189(1968);Griffin vs. Breckenridge, 403 US 88,91 S Ct 1790, 29 L Ed 2d 338(1971); Harlow vws.Fitzgerald, 457 US 800,73 L Ed 2d 396,102 S Ct 2727(1982) ,Nothing in Article III of the Constitution,authorizes federal judges to deny access to cou- rt to any person,citizen or otherwise,in the United States. To deny these Constitutional Rights is crimes itself,See @eGer O'Shea vs.Litleton, 414 US 488,38 L Ed 2d 674,94 S Ct 669 (1974); Dennis vs.Sparks, 449 US 24,66 L Ed 2d 185,101 S Ct 183(1980); City of Los Angeles vs.Lyons, 461 US 95,75 L Ed 2d (