◆ SpookStack

o | ~ O 746(1948). CONCLUSION OF LAW: are fully reviewable,and not subject to the "clear erroneous" standard.United States For Use of Mo- rris Constitution vs.Aetna Cas.Ins,908 F 2d 375 at 377(8th Cir.1990).This Court,should find no excusable reason for tr- ial court deliberate failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. . (3) WHETHER, This Appeal should be reversed,because under Feder- al Laws,Complaints against all three(3) Branches of the Un- ited States Government ,Judicial,Executive and Legislative can be brought in any Judicial District in any of the Fifty States of the United States,Except The Eastern District of Missouri,under 28 USC § 1391(e)(1)(2),That it were Constit- utional Rrror,Prejudice,and abuse of power for District Jud- ge,William D.Stiehl to Dismiss three(3) P-A-I-D Civil Righ- ts Complaint(S) W-I-T=H~P-R-E-J=U-D-I=C=E for lack of Juris— diction,Cross Discrimination on the Basis of Race,Class and to sanctioned by Judicial orders,criminal activities on the part of Appellees,With Overwhelming Evidence in Support be- fore the Judge ? The Supreme Court held in Stafford vs.Briggs, 444 US 537 at 544,545,100 S Ct 774 at 784,785,63 L Ed 2d 1(1980),suits aga- inst federal officers while in governnient service and after leaving that service can be brought in,any of the 95 federal districts of the United States.But here,this suit is unprec- edented,no ware in the Judiciary history,in this country or -1l7-