◆ SpookStack

O O to which he served in combat,over Thirty two Combat and reconnaissance missions headed by Appellant,yet the highest federal court in the United States,re- wards him by issuing judicial order,stating that he no longer has any Civil or Constitutional Rights, Privileges or Immunities while in the United States of America. Supreme Court Justices,en banc has knowingly sanct- ioned federal district courts,beginning in district of Missouri,Eastern Division Lie(S) and Deceptions since June 1976 heretofore,e.g.,June 4,8,1976 App- ellant and Wife,whom are White,indicted in 14 cou- nt federal indictment,tried upon known falsely man- ufactured evidence,Forgery of documents by prosecu- tor,trial judge,court appointed attorneys [ It sho- uld be noted: trial judge did ordered Appellant's Retained attorneys off the case,and over Appellant's Objections appointed its own attorneys,Fact set out in transcript of trial.All defense evidence suppres- sed by trial judge,with approval of defense counsel, no witness interviewed or call to testify,over[71] violations to a fair trial,See Complaint filed in this case in district court,Since 1976 heretofore, courts conspired to routinely and systemically, Denied Appellant a Hearing,on his 28 USC § § 2255, 2241,2242,2243,and the numerous Civil Rights Compl- aint(S),in violation of Precedent(S) of Supreme Court,e.g., see Sanders vs.United States, 373 US 1,10 L Ed 2d 148,83 S Ct 1068(1963); Townsend vs.Sain,373 US 310,9 L Ed 2d 770,83 S Ct 745(1963), and pursuant to McQueen vs,Swenson(I), 498 F 2d 207(8th Cir.1974) And McQueen vs.Swenson(II),560 F 2d 959(8th Cir.1977) ,Mc- Queen white male murdered a black male,guilt undis- puted, were Granted Two(2) Separate Hearing(S),plus Hearing McQueen had in State court,but for Twenty one (21) consecutive Years Appellant Denied a Hearing, This cause of acting begin in 1976 between the trial judge,federal attorney and Appellant,but because,rath-~ er than grant a Hearing,choose to conspire and coverup these crimes against Appellant,therefore people of the United States,now it is over seven Hundred persons in- volved in this case. The evidence against these Appellees is Crystal clear Unrebuttable,no defense can be made against the mount of indisputable evidence to be offered to prove guilt. Some of that evidence are in this Circuit transferred from Clerk of district court,Joint Appendices, Defendant judge,William D.Stiehl had before him,which he and ano- ther judge did reviewed,choose to disregard violation ~4-