◆ SpookStack

or O these three cases had been filed by an attorney,Therefore, was Appellant Discriminated Against,Deprived of Due Process and Equal Protection under the Law,because he were Pre Se pur- suant to 28 USC § 1654,Right to be Heard,Freedom of Speech, Access to Court,Right to offer supporting Evidence,to Litigate Right not to be deprived of these Rights under Amendments,1, _ 4,5,6,7,8,13 and 14 because he attempted to exercise and en- joy these Guarantees of the Constitution Pro Se ? (6) WHETHER, This appeal should be reversed because the United St- ates Supreme Court En Banc,its Clerk,Deputies,assistant and Law clerks,conspired agreed and exceed the scope of [all] au- thorities under Article III of the Constitution,28 USC § 453 § 455 et seq.,by corruptly issuing a Fraudulent opinion in Jones vs-ABC TV Network,et_al., No.995-7286, Forever Denying Appellant Access to Court based upon poverty,that knowingly set forth Falsely Manufactured Supported L-I-E(S) and Decept- ion(S).And to Block Petition for Writ of certiorari in Jones vs.William H.Rehnquist et al., due March 15 1996,and to avoid Impeachment,Removal from office tired Convicted and imprison- ed for its ongoing pattern of crimes sanctioned lower courts orders denying Appellant right to P-A-~Y Filing Fee and file Civil Rights Complaint(S),Litigate ? And That WHETHER pursu- ant to Conley vs.Gibson,355 US 4l (1957) ;Haines vs.Kerner,404 US 519(1972),Appellant Should be allowed to offer supporting Evidence to support his claims which would have entitle him to Relief ?