◆ SpookStack

© 0 "Judgment" or in some other manner,confirm that_the paper re- presents the court's judgment.See Axel Johnson, iInc.vs-Arthur, Anderson & Co., 6 F 3d 78 at 84 (24 Cir.1993),Separateness requirement.The requirement that Rule 58 be followed,is inte- nded to create a Bright Line" for the litigants and the court, ,and when the period for appeal begins.See Morris vs.City of, Hobart, 39 F 3d 1105 at 1110,(10th Cir.1994),Cert Denied___US ___,115 S Ct 1960,131 L Ed 2d 852(1995); Virgo vs-Rivers Beach Associate, 30 F 3d 1350 at 1356,(1lth Cir.1994),Court M-U-S-T Satisfy Rule 58,Judgment M-U-S-T appear on a document that is separate and distinct from the opinion explaining or justify- ing the order.See Barber vs.Whilpool Corp., 34 F 3d 1268 at 1274,(4th Cir.1994). (5) WHETHER, This Appeal should be reversed,because District Court Judge, William D.Stiehl,Did Discriminated Against Appellant,Did Deprived him of Due Process and Equal Protection under the Law by treating him and his causes indifferent from ‘other White, Rich,Famous,and Powerful Litigants,represented by high-priced attorneys,in violations of Haines vs.Kerner, 404 US 519(1972)? 1-The Appellees had not only violated the laws and regulat— ions of the Federal Communications Commission,but also Feder- al Criminal,Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Appellant by their conduct,Appellees,Viacon Broadcasting of Missouri, hereinafter(VBM) ,Allman, Connors, Hunter ,Cohen,Milner,Rothcild, Hammed, Bel1,Connon, Keiser, Barrett,Houston,did conspired with Federal district judges,Parry,Filippine chief,Limbaugh,Gunn, -17-