◆ SpookStack

0 ARGOMENT WHETHER, This Appeal should be Reversed,because the Deliber- ate failure of District Judge,William D.Stiehl to follow Rule 52 and all Federal Rules Civil and Appellate Procedurals, Req- iring trial Court make Findings of Fact and conclusions of Law,Conduct Warrants Impeachment,Removal From Office,and Cr- iminally Prosecuted as other citizens of the United States, under Article III § I of the Constitution ? Dennis vs.Sparks, 449 US 24,66 L Ed 2d 185 at 101,101 S Ct 183(1980); O'Shea vs.Littleton, 414 US 488 at 503,38 L Ed 2d 674,94 S Ct 669 at 679(1974); Butz vs-Economou, 438 US 478 at 506,57 L Ed 2d 895,98 S Ct 2894 at 2911(1978); Harlow vs. Fitzgerald,457 US 800 at 808,812,814,73 L Ed 2d 396,102 S Ct 2727 at 2733,2735,2736(1982); Stump vs-Sparkman, 435 US 349 at 356(footnote 6 admitted),55 L Ed 2d 331,98 S Ct 1099 at 1104,1105(1978);Griffin vs.Breckenridge, 403 US 88 at 102,103, 91 S ct 1790 at 1798,29-L Ed 2d 338(1971).. In this case,Imp- eachment is Constitutionally required. 2.Rule 52 Federal Rules Civil Procedural: Requires findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by trial judge in non-jury trials,and as herein,conspiracy to knowingly violate Federal Criminal,Civil and Constitutional Laws by trial judge overt . acts in issuing fraudulent order dismissing three(3) Paid Civil Rights Complaint(S) With-Prejudice prior to clerk sign- ing sealing and issuing Summonses presented to Clerk,by Appe- llant,blocking by judicial order,Appellees from answering to summons,and their crimes set forth in the Complaints.This co- nduct by district judge,William D.Stieh: -12-