◆ SpookStack

O ‘e) Routinely and Systemically Denied him a Hearing pursuant to 28 uSC § § 22255,2241,2242,2243 and Sanders vs-United States 373 US 1,10 L Ed 2d 148,83 S Ct 1068(1963) ; Townsend vs.Sain, 372 US 293.at°310,9 L Ed 2d 770 at 784,83 S Ct 745(1963); McQueen vs.Swueen(1),498 F 2d 207(8th Cir.1974); McQueen vs Swenson(II), 560 F 2a 959(8th Cir.1977),knowingly disregar- ding [ Precedent(S) of U.S.Supreme Court,and its Circuit ] After Appellant's release from Federal prison February 3rd 1986 he filed § 2255 in district court,Eastern District of Missouri,the same dismissed without hearing or redressing the facts/merits,and disregarding [ Overwhelming Document— ation Evidence,including the Forged Documents, by federal off- icers of the court. Appellant filed in the Western district of Missouri petition under § § 2241,2242,and 2243,the case subsequently transferred over Appellant's objections to the district court,Eastern district of Missouri,but after docke- ted Appellant amended the petition with Complaint under 42 usc § 1986 entitled Sylvester Jones vs-.William H.Rehnquist, Chief Justice,U.S.Supreme Court,et al., See No.94-CV-739 (1995),U.S.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit,appoint- ed district judge, Fernando gJ.Gaitan to preside.Appellant did by professional process servers,served summonses and copy of complaints upon each defendant,over(250),some of the summon- ses returns Appellant filed with clerk,and other affidavits for collection of costs and attorney fees from Defendants that had failed to response to Waivers of service of summon- see Mathhon vs.Marine Midand Bank,N.A.,875 F.Supp-986(E.D.N. -5-