◆ SpookStack

- MAY-28-1994 15:29 FROM CLU IT TQS oe : P.19 O QO Jones vs.Alfred H.Mayer Co., 392 US 409,88 S Ct 2186,20 L Ed 2d 1189(1968); Imbler vs.Pachtman, 424 US 409,47 L Ed 2a 128, 96 S Ct 984(1976); Bivens vs.Six Unknown Name@ Agents of Feb- eral of Narcotics, 403 US 388,91 S Ct 1999,29 L Ed 2d 619(1971), Harlow vs.Fitzgerald, 457 US 800,73 L Ed 2d 396,102 S Ct 2727 (1982); United States vs.Gaubert,_US__111 S$ Ct 1267(1991); United States vs.James Daniel Good Real Property, Slip op.,No. 92~1180,Decided December 13,1993(U.S.Supreme Court); Leatherman @ . e vs.Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, us 113 S Ct 1160(1993); Griffin vs.Breckenridge, 403 US 88,102 S Ct 1970,29°'L Ea 2a 338(1971): Board of Regents of State Colleges vs.Roth, 408 US 564,33 L Ed 2d 548,92 S Ct 2791 Pa (1972); Pulliam, Magistrate vs.Allen, 466 US 522,80 L Ed 2d 565, 104 S Ct 1970(1984); O'Shea vs.Littieton, 414 US 488,38 L Ed 2d 674,94 S Ct 669(1974); Dennis vs.Sparks, 449 US 24,66 L Ed 2€185,101 S Ct 183(1980); United States vs.Nixon, 418 US 683, 41 L Ea 2a 1039,94 S Ct 3090(1974); City of Los Angeles vs. Lyons, 461 US 95,75 L Ed 2a 675,103 S Ct 1660(1983); Butz va.Economou, 438 US 478,57 L Ed 2d 895.98 S Ct 2894(1978): United States vs.Will, 449 US 200(1980); Scheuer vs.Rhodes, 416 US 232,40 L Ed 2a 90,94 S Ct 1683(1974): Smith vs.Wade, 461 US 30,75 L Ed 2a 632,103 S Ct 1625(1983); Sullivan vs. Little Hunting Park,Inec., 396 US 229,90-S Ct 400,24 L Ed 2a 386(1969): Conley vs.Gibson,355 US 41,78 S Ct 99,2 L Ed 2a 80 (1957); Haines vs.Kerner, 404 US 519.92 S Ct 591,30 L Ed 2a 652(1972); Estelle vs.Gamble, 429 US 97,50°L Ed 2a 251,97 S . Ct 285(1976); Neitzke vs.Williams, 490 US 319,104 L Ed 2a 338, -2- _APPENDIX~A