◆ SpookStack

Page 8 Complaint to FBI James W.Nelson From Sylvester Jones Complainant routinely and systemically Denying Complainant his Constitut- jonal Right To Be Heard. In each pleading filed by Complai- nant in federal district court,the judges as the 11 page order attached hereto,has acted in the role as attorney,counsels,and representatives for Defendants.Complainant paid all the costs and on the face of his complaint clearly states: "Demand For Jury Trial," See the Seventh Amendment and Rule 38 Fed.R.Civ. P.,if Complainant has been one of the attorneys,the clerk. of the court would have set a trial date,and the presiding judge would have brought the case before a duty elected and sworn jury and tried the case,and guilt or innocence of Defendants would be by the jury based upon the evidence,and not a racist judge,depriving Complainant of all those rights,in violation of 28 USC § 1654. The Supreme Court said in City of Los Angeles vs. Lyons, 461 US 95,75 L Ed 2d 675,103 S Ct 1660(1983),that: "If...has suffered injury barred by the Federal Constitution,he has a remedy for damages under § 1983. Furthermore those who deliberately de- prive a citizen of his constitutional rights | r-i-s-k conviction under the federal criminal laws." In Dennis vs.Sparks, 449 US 24,66 L Ed 2d 185,101 S Ct 183 (1980),the Court said: "But judicial immunity was not designed to insulate the judiciary from all aspects of public accounta- - -bility;. Judges--are: -immune--from §-1983--damages act- ions, but they are subject to criminal prosecutio- ns aS are other citizens." In O'Shea vs.Littleton, 414 US 488,38 L Ed-2d 674,94 S Ct (1974),the Court said: "Judges who would willfully discriminate on the ground of race or otherwise would willfully deprive the citizen of his constitutional rights, ---must take account of 18 U.S.C. § 242." Complainant has requested in writing,letters,complaints,addre- ssed to the U.S.Attorneys,from 1976 hereto,attorney,Edward L. Dowd Jr.,provided overwhelming documentary-evidence and offered testimonies of eye witnesses,to support the claims of crimes knowingly and intentionally with reckless and callous disregar- ds for the Civil and Constitutional rights,Privileges and immu- nities of Complainant,members of his race and class,and laws of the United States by these federal judges,attorneys,and other named herein,and in other pleadings of. their guilt,but Dowd has as.a pattern of conduct ignored the evidence and Complaina- nt